These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11496839)

  • 21. Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial.
    Brem RF; Baum J; Lechner M; Kaplan S; Souders S; Naul LG; Hoffmeister J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Sep; 181(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 12933460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computed tomographic laser mammography, a practical review.
    Richter DM
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Jun; 59(6):687-93. PubMed ID: 12881671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Uchiyama Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Jul; 62(8):409-14. PubMed ID: 12187836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Equipment for digital mammography].
    Blinov NN; Kozlovskiĭ ÉB; Mazurov AI
    Med Tekh; 2014; (5):1-4. PubMed ID: 25543389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program.
    Cupples TE; Cunningham JE; Reynolds JC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Oct; 185(4):944-50. PubMed ID: 16177413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: detection in dependence of the BI-RADS categories.
    Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
    Breast J; 2006; 12(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 16409582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. MammoSys: A content-based image retrieval system using breast density patterns.
    de Oliveira JE; Machado AM; Chavez GC; Lopes AP; Deserno TM; Araújo Ade A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2010 Sep; 99(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 20207441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. 2001 mammography and CAD survey.
    Radiol Manage; 2001; 23(3):56. PubMed ID: 11496840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The IntegRIS radiological information system for digital mammography].
    Kochetova GP; Rozhkova NI; Belle TS
    Med Tekh; 2009; (5):42-5. PubMed ID: 19916305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How not to assess computer-aided detection for mammography.
    Guenin MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jun; 182(6):1599; author reply 1599-600. PubMed ID: 15150019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improved sensitivity of mammography with computer-aided detection.
    Hall FM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jun; 182(6):1598; author reply 1598-9. PubMed ID: 15150018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [3D reconstruction of microcalcification clusters].
    Wolf D; Gresson R; Stines J; Daul C; Troufléau P
    J Radiol; 2001 Jun; 82(6 Pt 1):647-51. PubMed ID: 11449166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digital mammography: novel applications.
    Rafferty EA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):831-43, vii. PubMed ID: 17888772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fast 3D Near-infrared breast imaging using indocyanine green for detection and characterization of breast lesions.
    Schneider P; Piper S; Schmitz CH; Schreiter NF; Volkwein N; Lüdemann L; Malzahn U; Poellinger A
    Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):956-63. PubMed ID: 21972043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Re: Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system.
    Feig SA; Sickles EA; Evans WP; Linver MN
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Aug; 96(16):1260-1; author reply 1261. PubMed ID: 15316065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A blurry picture. Mammography, though marred by controversy, is still the most valued tool for detecting breast cancer. But a continuing shortage of radiologists takes some luster off the gold standard.
    Becker C
    Mod Healthc; 2002 Dec; 32(48):28-33. PubMed ID: 12510629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The ABBI system as a possibility for evaluating non-palpable lesions].
    Winzer KJ; Filimonow S; Guski H; Bick U; Hamm B; Müller JM
    Zentralbl Chir; 1998; 123 Suppl 5():57-62. PubMed ID: 10063575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Digital mammography: an update.
    Hailey D
    Issues Emerg Health Technol; 2006 Oct; (91):1-4. PubMed ID: 17073037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Mammography 1994, Part I].
    Friedrich M
    Rofo; 1994 Feb; 160(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 8312504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of segmentation of a commercial computer-aided detection system for mammography.
    Baker JA; Rosen EL; Crockett MM; Lo JY
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):385-90. PubMed ID: 15770043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.