136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11497324)
1. Superordinate categorization via learned stimulus equivalence: quantity of reinforcement, hedonic value, and the nature of the mediator.
Astley SL; Peissig JJ; Wasserman EA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Jul; 27(3):252-68. PubMed ID: 11497324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Superordinate category formation in pigeons: association with a common delay or probability of food reinforcement makes perceptually dissimilar stimuli functionally equivalent.
Astley SL; Wasserman EA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Oct; 25(4):415-32. PubMed ID: 10531658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Response rate is not an effective mediator of learned stimulus equivalence in pigeons.
Frank AJ; Wasserman EA
Learn Behav; 2005 Aug; 33(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 16396076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Discriminative stimuli that follow the absence of reinforcement are preferred by pigeons over those that follow reinforcement.
Friedrich AM; Clement TS; Zentall TR
Learn Behav; 2005 Aug; 33(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 16396080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Scene gist categorization by pigeons.
Kirkpatrick K; Bilton T; Hansen BC; Loschky LC
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Apr; 40(2):162-77. PubMed ID: 24364667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Imitative learning of stimulus-response and response-outcome associations in pigeons.
Saggerson AL; George DN; Honey RC
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jul; 31(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 16045384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aspects of the reinforcer learned in second-order Pavlovian conditioning.
Rescorla RA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1979 Jan; 5(1):79-95. PubMed ID: 528880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.
Smith AP; Zentall TR
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Concept learning without differential reinforcement in pigeons by means of contextual cueing.
Couto KC; Navarro VM; Smith TR; Wasserman EA
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 26914972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transfer to intermediate forms following concept discrimination by pigeons: chimeras and morphs.
Ghosh N; Lea SE; Noury M
J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Sep; 82(2):125-41. PubMed ID: 15540501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attenuation of sucrose reinforcement in dopamine D1 receptor deficient mice.
El-Ghundi M; O'Dowd BF; Erclik M; George SR
Eur J Neurosci; 2003 Feb; 17(4):851-62. PubMed ID: 12603275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DISCRIMINATIVE FUNCTIONS BASED ON A DELAY IN THE REINFORCEMENT RELATION.
MABRY JH
J Exp Anal Behav; 1965 Mar; 8(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 14269568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Some determiners of attention.
Johnson DF; Cumming WW
J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Mar; 11(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 5645872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of body weight on discriminative-stimulus control by phencyclidine in the pigeon.
Massey BW; McMillan DE
J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Mar; 47(2):233-9. PubMed ID: 3572300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pigeons prefer discriminative stimuli independently of the overall probability of reinforcement and of the number of presentations of the conditioned reinforcer.
Stagner JP; Laude JR; Zentall TR
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Oct; 38(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 23066982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Configurations of the interoceptive discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol and nicotine with two different exteroceptive contexts in rats: Extinction & recovery.
Troisi JR; Craig EM
Behav Processes; 2015 Jun; 115():169-80. PubMed ID: 25895858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unblocking in Pavlovian appetitive conditioning.
Holland PC
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1984 Oct; 10(4):476-97. PubMed ID: 6491608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.
KELLEHER RT; GOLLUB LR
J Exp Anal Behav; 1962 Oct; 5(4 Suppl):543-97. PubMed ID: 14031747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Suboptimal choice by pigeons may result from the diminishing effect of nonreinforcement.
Laude JR; Stagner JP; Zentall TR
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 24893105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Disruption of responding maintained by conditioned reinforcement: alterations in response-conditioned-reinforcer relations.
Lieving GA; Reilly MP; Lattal KA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Sep; 86(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 17002227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
