These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1149887)

  • 21. Does peer review at the US National Institutes of Health need modifying?
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Feb; 16(2):238. PubMed ID: 18284879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Biodefense. U.S. agencies unveil plan for biosecurity peer review.
    Couzin J
    Science; 2004 Mar; 303(5664):1595. PubMed ID: 15016970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. U.S. science policy. Risky business.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2004 Oct; 306(5694):220-1. PubMed ID: 15472055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Varmus speaks out on need to boost clinical research.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Nov; 372(6502):118. PubMed ID: 7969431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. National Institutes of Health. Grants 'below payline' rise to help new investigators.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2009 Sep; 325(5948):1607. PubMed ID: 19779159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. NIH needs a makeover.
    Dey SK
    Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5943):944. PubMed ID: 19696331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Science policy. Peer-review critic gets NIH 'rejects'.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2001 Nov; 294(5545):1255-7. PubMed ID: 11701895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Nobel lesson: the grant behind the prize.
    Berg JM
    Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5865):900-1. PubMed ID: 18276870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. National Institutes of Health. Zerhouni's parting message: make room for young scientists.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5903):834-5. PubMed ID: 18988813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Remembering the peer in peer review.
    O'Connell KA
    Nurs Res; 1987; 36(6):379-80. PubMed ID: 3671127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. NSF probes peer review; NIH investigates awards.
    Change; 1976 Feb; 8(1):60-1. PubMed ID: 1030336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rethinking grant review.
    Nat Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 11(2):119. PubMed ID: 18227790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. MRC commitments.
    Harvey SC
    Science; 1998 Feb; 279(5353):967-8. PubMed ID: 9490479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparability of the American Cancer Society and National Institutes of Health peer review systems.
    Vivona S; Do van Quy D
    Cancer Res; 1973 Apr; 33(4):919. PubMed ID: 4739656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In defence of small science.
    Sachs F
    Nature; 1997 Nov; 390(6656):203. PubMed ID: 9367161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An open letter to Elias Zerhouni.
    Altman S; Bassler BL; Beckwith J; Belfort M; Berg HC; Bloom B; Brenchley JE; Campbell A; Collier RJ; Connell N; Cozzarelli NR; Craig NL; Darst S; Ebright RH; Elledge SJ; Falkow S; Galan JE; Gottesman M; Gourse R; Grindley ND; Gross CA; Grossman A; Hochschild A; Howe M; Hurwitz J; Isberg RR; Kaplan S; Kornberg A; Kustu SG; Landick RC; Landy A; Levy SB; Losick R; Long SR; Maloy SR; Mekalanos JJ; Neidhardt FC; Pace NR; Ptashne M; Roberts JW; Roth JR; Rothman-Denes LB; Salyers A; Schaechter M; Shapiro L; Silhavy TJ; Simon MI; Walker G; Yanofsky C; Zinder N
    Science; 2005 Mar; 307(5714):1409-10. PubMed ID: 15746409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system.
    Hegde D; Mowery DC
    Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1797-8. PubMed ID: 19095928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A Nobel lesson: the grant behind the prize. Response.
    Capecchi MR
    Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5865):900-1. PubMed ID: 18283726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Moron peer review.
    Brenner S
    Curr Biol; 1999 Oct; 9(20):R755. PubMed ID: 10531042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. NIH response to open letter.
    Fauci AS; Zerhouni EA
    Science; 2005 Apr; 308(5718):49. PubMed ID: 15802584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.