BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11499194)

  • 1. Fetal abdominal circumference and macrosomia.
    Gherman R
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Jul; 46(7):699-700. PubMed ID: 11499194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal abdominal circumference measurements of 35 and 38 cm as predictors of macrosomia. A risk factor for shoulder dystocia.
    Gilby JR; Williams MC; Spellacy WN
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Nov; 45(11):936-8. PubMed ID: 11127108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Prevention of shoulder dystocia by an ultrasound selection at the beginning of labour of foetuses with large abdominal circumference].
    Maticot-Baptista D; Collin A; Martin A; Maillet R; Riethmuller D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2007 Feb; 36(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 17293252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the measurement of the fetal fat layer, interventricular septum and abdominal circumference percentile in the prediction of macrosomia in pregnancies affected by gestational diabetes.
    Bethune M; Bell R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Dec; 22(6):586-90. PubMed ID: 14689530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Relationship between fetal abdominal circumference and birth weight: clinical findings in 1475 pregnancies].
    Shi CY; Zhang XX; Jin YZ; Dong Y; Zhang YY; Lin L; Li XJ; Zhang BR
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Nov; 40(11):732-4. PubMed ID: 16324244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intrapartum fetal abdominal circumference by ultrasonography for predicting fetal macrosomia.
    Loetworawanit R; Chittacharoen A; Sututvoravut S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Oct; 89 Suppl 4():S60-4. PubMed ID: 17726811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Choosing route of delivery for the macrosomic infant of a diabetic mother: Cesarean section versus vaginal delivery.
    Conway DL
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2002 Dec; 12(6):442-8. PubMed ID: 12683659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Difficulties in antenatal recognition of fetal macrosomia].
    Goffinet F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Jan; 29(1 Suppl):13-9. PubMed ID: 10675843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correctly identifying the macrosomic fetus: improving ultrasonography-based prediction.
    Sokol RJ; Chik L; Dombrowski MP; Zador IE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1489-95. PubMed ID: 10871470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review.
    Chauhan SP; Grobman WA; Gherman RA; Chauhan VB; Chang G; Magann EF; Hendrix NW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 193(2):332-46. PubMed ID: 16098852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Management of suspected fetal macrosomia.
    Zamorski MA; Biggs WS
    Am Fam Physician; 2001 Jan; 63(2):302-6. PubMed ID: 11201695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Fetal macrosomia: mode of delivery].
    Tatarova S; Popov I; Khristova P
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2004; 43(6):9-12. PubMed ID: 15669645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of fetal macrosomia by single ultrasonic fetal biometry.
    Chen CP; Chang FM; Chang CH; Lin YS; Chou CY; Ko HC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1993 Jan; 92(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 8099822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A case of nondiabetic macrosomia with Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome: antenatal sonographic findings.
    Yamashita H; Yasuhi I; Ishimaru T; Matsumoto T; Yamabe T
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 1995; 10(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 7794515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shoulder soft tissue width as a predictor of macrosomia in diabetic pregnancies.
    Mintz MC; Landon MB; Gabbe SG; Marinelli DL; Ludmir J; Grumbach K; Arger PH; Coleman BG
    Am J Perinatol; 1989 Apr; 6(2):240-3. PubMed ID: 2653337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
    Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Massive increase of foetal abdominal circumference due to hereditary polycystic kidney disease].
    Dukic L; Schaffelder R; Schaible T; Sütterlin M; Siemer J
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2010 Jun; 214(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 20574939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Large fetus--a retrospective study].
    Wojtasinska M; Belfrage P; Gjessing L
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Jun; 120(16):1848-50. PubMed ID: 10925609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Idiopathic polyhydramnios: association with fetal macrosomia.
    Sohaey R; Nyberg DA; Sickler GK; Williams MA
    Radiology; 1994 Feb; 190(2):393-6. PubMed ID: 8284386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The macrosomic fetus: a challenge in current obstetrics.
    Henriksen T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(2):134-45. PubMed ID: 18231880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.