These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11499462)
1. Clinical identification of compensatory structures on projective tests: a self psychological approach. Silverstein ML J Pers Assess; 2001 Jun; 76(3):517-36. PubMed ID: 11499462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Self psychology interpretation of the Thematic Apperception Test. Benziman H; Perlow M Bull Menninger Clin; 1999; 63(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 10028749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of personality tests on state and trait anxiety. Newmark CS; Hetzel W; Frerking RA J Pers Assess; 1974 Feb; 38(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 4149986 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The evolution of the psychology of the self: toward a mature narcissism. Gehrie MJ Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Apr; 1159():31-50. PubMed ID: 19379230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Personality of the dyslexic child. Clinical data and contribution of projective technics]. Labar P; Arend-Dufrasne R; Mormont C Acta Psychiatr Belg; 1975 Mar; 75(2):117-32. PubMed ID: 788463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Psychological changes in a group of tuberculous patients examined by projective tests (Rorschach and TAT)]. SAMALE L Arch Psicol Neurol Psichiatr; 1954; 15(4-5):397-436. PubMed ID: 13218931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Apropos of projective tests conducted on substance-dependent clients]. Moralès M Psychiatr Enfant; 1986; 29(2):421-67. PubMed ID: 3786582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Personality assessment and test interpretation of Mexican Americans: a critique. Padilla AM; Ruiz RA J Pers Assess; 1975 Apr; 39(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 1097629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [ON THE FATHER PROBLEM IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MALE CHILD]. LANGEVELD MJ Vita Hum Int Z Lebensalterforsch; 1964; 7():33-48. PubMed ID: 15446098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A review of projective test findings with older adults. Panek PE; Wagner EE; Kennedy-Zwergel K J Pers Assess; 1983 Dec; 47(6):562-82. PubMed ID: 6363672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A study of some "test dimensions" conceptions. SEEMAN W; MARKS PA J Proj Tech; 1962 Dec; 26():469-73. PubMed ID: 13987646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Blind test interpretation to overcome student resistance to projective techniques courses. Rader GE; Schill TR J Pers Assess; 1973 Jun; 37(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 4575075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of projective methods in research: 1947-1965. Crenshaw DA; Bohn S; Hoffman MR; Matheus JM; Offenbach SG J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1968 Feb; 32(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 4866678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Test of animal affinities (T.a.a)]. Bour P Ann Med Psychol (Paris); 1972 May; 1(5):645-72 concl. PubMed ID: 4562903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Projective methods and dangerous behavior]. Mormont C Acta Psychiatr Belg; 1988; 88(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 3051890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A critique of Lilienfeld et al.'s (2000) "The scientific status of projective techniques". Hibbard S J Pers Assess; 2003 Jun; 80(3):260-71. PubMed ID: 12763700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Projective methodologies. Fisher S Annu Rev Psychol; 1967; 18():165-90. PubMed ID: 5333546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]