100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11500596)
1. Effect of dose levels on the diagnostic performance of a selenium-based digital chest system.
van Heesewijk HP; Casparie HW; de Valois JC; van der Graaf Y
Invest Radiol; 2001 Aug; 36(8):455-9. PubMed ID: 11500596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital chest imaging using a selenium detector. The impact of hard copy size on observer performance: a computed tomography-controlled study.
van Heesewijk HP; van der Graff Y; de Valois JC; Vos JA; Feldberg MA
Invest Radiol; 1997 Jun; 32(6):363-7. PubMed ID: 9179712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chest imaging with a selenium detector versus conventional film radiography: a CT-controlled study.
van Heesewijk HP; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Vos JA; Feldberg MA
Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):687-90. PubMed ID: 8756915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of dose reduction on digital chest imaging using a selenium detector: a study of detecting simulated diffuse interstitial pulmonary disease.
van Heesewijk HP; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Feldberg MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Aug; 167(2):403-8. PubMed ID: 8686616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital chest imaging using a selenium detector. A simulated diffuse interstitial pulmonary disease detection study.
van Heesewijk HP; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Feldberg AM
Invest Radiol; 1995 May; 30(5):300-5. PubMed ID: 7558735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of pulmonary edema in pigs: storage phosphor versus amorphous selenium-based flat-panel-detector radiography.
Kim TS; Im JG; Goo JM; Lee KH; Lee YJ; Kim SH; Kim S
Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 12034937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital storage phosphor chest radiography: an ROC study of the effect of 2K versus 4K matrix size on observer performance.
Miró SP; Leung AN; Rubin GD; Choi YH; Kee ST; Mindelzun RE; Stark P; Wexler L; Plevritis SK; Betts BJ
Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 11161174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic performance of a prototype dual-energy chest imaging system ROC analysis.
Kashani H; Varon CA; Paul NS; Gang GJ; Van Metter R; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH
Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 20042351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Metz S; Damoser P; Hollweck R; Roggel R; Engelke C; Woertler K; Renger B; Rummeny EJ; Link TM
Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 15734933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study.
Garmer M; Hennigs SP; Jäger HJ; Schrick F; van de Loo T; Jacobs A; Hanusch A; Christmann A; Mathias K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions.
Schaefer-Prokop CM; Prokop M; Schmidt A; Neitzel U; Galanski M
Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8816519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of digital with film radiographs for the classification of pneumoconiotic pleural abnormalities.
Larson TC; Holiday DB; Antao VC; Thomas J; Pinheiro G; Kapil V; Franzblau A
Acad Radiol; 2012 Feb; 19(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 22098943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital chest radiography with a selenium-based flat-panel detector versus a storage phosphor system: comparison of soft-copy images.
Goo JM; Im JG; Kim JH; Seo JB; Kim TS; Shine SJ; Lee W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1013-8. PubMed ID: 11000155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Can digital selenium-based radiography in thoracic diagnosis replace the analog x-ray imaging technic?].
Zähringer M; Krug B; Dölken W; Gossmann A; Lackner K
Rofo; 1997 Jul; 167(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 9289041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Vereecken L; De Hauwere A; Duyck P; De Man R; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):630-7. PubMed ID: 16928923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of eight different digital chest radiography systems: variation in detection of simulated chest disease.
Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; Boot MV; Geleijns J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Aug; 185(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 16037503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital selenium radiography: anti-scatter grid for chest radiography in a clinical study.
Bernhardt TM; Rapp-Bernhardt U; Hausmann T; Reichel G; Krause UW; Doehring W
Br J Radiol; 2000 Sep; 73(873):963-8. PubMed ID: 11064649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phantom study of chest radiography with storage phosphor, selenium, and film-screen systems.
Kehler M; Lyttkens K; Andersson B; Hochbergs P; Lindberg CG; Medin J; Nordström AJ; Sanfridsson J; Vojciechowski J
Acta Radiol; 1996 May; 37(3 Pt 1):332-6. PubMed ID: 8845264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
