These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11500596)

  • 21. Detection of simulated chest lesions with normal and reduced radiation dose: comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon.
    Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser JK; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Feuerbach S
    Invest Radiol; 1998 Feb; 33(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 9493725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Temporal subtraction for the detection of hazy pulmonary opacities on chest radiography.
    Tsubamoto M; Johkoh T; Kozuka T; Tomiyama N; Hamada S; Honda O; Mihara N; Koyama M; Maeda M; Nakamura H; Fujiwara K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Aug; 179(2):467-71. PubMed ID: 12130454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Selenium-based digital radiography versus high-resolution storage phosphor radiography in the detection of solitary pulmonary nodules without calcification: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
    Awai K; Komi M; Hori S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1141-4. PubMed ID: 11641189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lung nodule detection performance in five observers on computed tomography (CT) with adaptive iterative dose reduction using three-dimensional processing (AIDR 3D) in a Japanese multicenter study: Comparison between ultra-low-dose CT and low-dose CT by receiver-operating characteristic analysis.
    Nagatani Y; Takahashi M; Murata K; Ikeda M; Yamashiro T; Miyara T; Koyama H; Koyama M; Sato Y; Moriya H; Noma S; Tomiyama N; Ohno Y; Murayama S;
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jul; 84(7):1401-12. PubMed ID: 25892051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Technical evaluation of a digital chest radiography system that uses a selenium detector.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):264-70. PubMed ID: 7892483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interpretation of digital chest radiographs: comparison of light emitting diode versus cold cathode fluorescent lamp backlit monitors.
    Lim HJ; Chung MJ; Lee G; Yie M; Shin KE; Moon JW; Lee KS
    Korean J Radiol; 2013; 14(6):968-76. PubMed ID: 24265575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.
    Strotzer M; Völk M; Fründ R; Hamer O; Zorger N; Feuerbach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):169-71. PubMed ID: 11756114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Detectability of simulated pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: comparison between irradiation side sampling indirect flat-panel detector and computed radiography.
    Yano Y; Yabuuchi H; Tanaka N; Morishita J; Akasaka T; Matsuo Y; Sunami S; Kamitani T; Jinnouchi M; Yamasaki Y; Nagao M; Sasaki M
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):2050-4. PubMed ID: 23827799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improved detection of lung nodules on chest radiographs using a commercial computer-aided diagnosis system.
    Kakeda S; Moriya J; Sato H; Aoki T; Watanabe H; Nakata H; Oda N; Katsuragawa S; Yamamoto K; Doi K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Feb; 182(2):505-10. PubMed ID: 14736690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The value of the supine chest x-ray with digital luminescence radiography in relation to the experience of the observer. A ROC analysis in CT-validated cases].
    Schäfer CB; Sokiranski R; Strayle M; Linstedt-Hilden M; Dietz K; Deusch H; Hoffmann W; Claussen CD
    Rofo; 1994 Jul; 161(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 8043760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Digital chest radiography system with amorphous selenium flat-panel detectors: Qualitative and dosimetric comparison with a dedicated film-screen system.
    Prato A; Ropolo R; Fava C
    Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):561-73. PubMed ID: 16437042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Chest radiography with a shaped filter at 140 kVp: its diagnostic accuracy compared with that of standard radiographs.
    Guilbeau JC; Mazoyer BM; Pruvost P; Verrey B; Grenier P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 May; 150(5):1007-10. PubMed ID: 3258700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improved detection of subtle lung nodules by use of chest radiographs with bone suppression imaging: receiver operating characteristic analysis with and without localization.
    Li F; Hara T; Shiraishi J; Engelmann R; MacMahon H; Doi K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):W535-41. PubMed ID: 21512042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Börjesson J; Mattsson S; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison between a screen-film system and a selenium radiography system. An ROC study using simulated thoracic lesions.
    Kotter E; Einert A; Merz C; Allmann KH; Altehoefer C; Ghanem N; Langer M
    Invest Radiol; 1999 Apr; 34(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 10196722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Digital radiography: from storage phosphor plates to direct detector systems].
    Schaefer-Prokop C; Uffmann M; Stadler A
    Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl; 2002; (113):30-4. PubMed ID: 12621834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digital selenium radiography: detection of subtle pulmonary lesions on images acquired with and without an additional antiscatter grid.
    Otto D; Ludwig K; Fessel A; Bernhardt TM; Kästner A; Reissberg S; Döhring W
    Eur J Radiol; 2000 Nov; 36(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 11116175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The amorphous selenium based flat-panel detector. Clinical experiences].
    Schmidt EL; Herbig W
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 12764586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Digital selenium radiography: a comparison of the picture quality of thoracic images in normal and reduced image formats based on the structural anatomical details].
    Zähringer M; Krug B; Kamm KF; Jung G; Dölken W; Wassmer G; Lackner K
    Rofo; 1998 Jul; 169(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 9711280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise.
    Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Johnsson AA; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 15933088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.