These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11500596)

  • 41. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [ROC analysis of detection of interval changes in interstitial lung diseases on digital chest radiographs using the temporal subtraction technique].
    Higashida Y; Ideguchi T; Muranaka T; Tabata N; Miyajima R; Akazawa F; Ikeda H; Morimoto K; Ohki M; Toyofuku F; Doi K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Jan; 64(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 14994509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Image quality of a digital chest radiography system based on a selenium detector.
    Neitzel U; Maack I; Günther-Kohfahl S
    Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 8058016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The value of digital tomosynthesis in the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary lesions on chest radiography: analysis of diagnostic accuracy and confidence.
    Quaia E; Baratella E; Cioffi V; Bregant P; Cernic S; Cuttin R; Cova MA
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1267-74. PubMed ID: 20591695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Digital storage phosphor imaging versus conventional film radiography in CT-documented chest disease.
    Schaefer CM; Greene R; Oestmann JW; Hall DA; Llewellyn HJ; McCarthy KA; Pile-Spellman ER; Rubens JR
    Radiology; 1990 Jan; 174(1):207-10. PubMed ID: 2294549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Full-size digital storage phosphor chest radiography: effect of 4K versus 2K matrix size on observer performance in detection of subtle interstitial abnormalities.
    Ueguchi T; Johkoh T; Tomiyama N; Honda O; Mihara N; Hamada S; Murai S; Ogata Y; Matsumoto M; Nakamura H
    Radiat Med; 2005 May; 23(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 15940063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Temporal subtraction for detection of solitary pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: evaluation of a commercially available computer-aided diagnosis system.
    Johkoh T; Kozuka T; Tomiyama N; Hamada S; Honda O; Mihara N; Koyama M; Tsubamoto M; Maeda M; Nakamura H; Saki H; Fujiwara K
    Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):806-11. PubMed ID: 12034953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Ultralow-dose chest computed tomography for pulmonary nodule detection: first performance evaluation of single energy scanning with spectral shaping.
    Gordic S; Morsbach F; Schmidt B; Allmendinger T; Flohr T; Husarik D; Baumueller S; Raupach R; Stolzmann P; Leschka S; Frauenfelder T; Alkadhi H
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):465-73. PubMed ID: 24598443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography for detection of simulated nodules and interstitial disease in a chest phantom.
    Kroft LJ; Geleijns J; Mertens BJ; Veldkamp WJ; Zonderland HM; de Roos A
    Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):156-63. PubMed ID: 14990807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The feasibility of low-dose CT for pulmonary metastasis in patients with primary gynecologic malignancy.
    Weng MJ; Wu MT; Pan HB; Kan YY; Yang CF
    Clin Imaging; 2004; 28(6):408-14. PubMed ID: 15531140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Dual-source dual-energy CT angiography with virtual non-enhanced images and iodine map for active gastrointestinal bleeding: image quality, radiation dose and diagnostic performance.
    Sun H; Hou XY; Xue HD; Li XG; Jin ZY; Qian JM; Yu JC; Zhu HD
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 May; 84(5):884-91. PubMed ID: 25650332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Flat-panel x-ray detector using amorphous silicon technology. Reduced radiation dose for the detection of foreign bodies.
    Völk M; Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Alexander J; Fründ R; Seitz J; Manke C; Spahn M; Feuerbach S
    Invest Radiol; 1997 Jul; 32(7):373-7. PubMed ID: 9228601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Nodular lesions simulated on an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom. A comparison between analog and digital images of the thorax].
    Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Sartoni Galloni S; Guidarelli G; Pastori R
    Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):54-8. PubMed ID: 8480049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Bone suppressed images improve radiologists' detection performance for pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs.
    Schalekamp S; van Ginneken B; Meiss L; Peters-Bax L; Quekel LG; Snoeren MM; Tiehuis AM; Wittenberg R; Karssemeijer N; Schaefer-Prokop CM
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2399-405. PubMed ID: 24113431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Chest radiography: ROC phantom study of four different digital systems and one conventional radiographic system].
    Redlich U; Reissberg S; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 12525979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
    Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Influence of display quality on radiologists' performance in the detection of lung nodules on radiographs.
    Buls N; Shabana W; Verbeek P; Pevenage P; De Mey J
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Sep; 80(957):738-43. PubMed ID: 17709363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Image quality of digital chest radiography: evaluation of subtle interstitial lung abnormalities (preliminary study).
    Ikezoe J; Kido S; Takeuchi N; Kondoh H; Arisawa J; Kozuka T
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1994 May; 43(1-2):107-14. PubMed ID: 7956132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Sub-solid Nodule Detection Performance on Reduced-dose Computed Tomography with Iterative Reduction: Comparison Between 20 mA (7 mAs) and 120 mA (42 mAs) Regarding Nodular Size and Characteristics and Association with Size-specific Dose Estimate.
    Nagatani Y; Takahashi M; Ikeda M; Yamashiro T; Koyama H; Koyama M; Moriya H; Noma S; Tomiyama N; Ohno Y; Murata K; Murayama S;
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):995-1007. PubMed ID: 28606593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.