These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11500740)

  • 1. Guidelines and code of ethics.
    Ghanem AN
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Jul; 21(7):694. PubMed ID: 11500740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The importance of peer review.
    Wheeler HL; Wheeler WB
    J Agric Food Chem; 2006 Nov; 54(24):8983. PubMed ID: 17117781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical guidelines to publication of chemical research.
    Editors of the Publications Division, Ameican Chemical Society
    Biomacromolecules; 2001; 2(1):19A-21A. PubMed ID: 12442743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correcting the medical literature: ethics and policy.
    Sataloff RT
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2005 Feb; 84(2):65-6. PubMed ID: 15794533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Publication ethics.
    Hays JC
    Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comments on European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications.
    Foote M; Hamilton CW; Mallia-Hughes M
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 May; 21(5):703-4; author reply 704. PubMed ID: 15969869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reviewing manuscripts: tips and responsibilities.
    Heddle NM; Ness PM
    Transfusion; 2009 Nov; 49(11):2265-8. PubMed ID: 19761546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does industry sponsorship undermine the integrity of nutrition research?
    Katan MB
    PLoS Med; 2007 Jan; 4(1):e6. PubMed ID: 17214505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On cloning research, peer review and the possibility of fraud.
    Carrió I
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Mar; 33(3):235-6. PubMed ID: 16477432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When reviews attack: ethics, free speech, and the peer review process.
    Hadjistavropoulos T; Bieling PJ
    Can Psychol; 2000 Aug; 41(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 16440473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On ethical peer review and publication: the importance of professional conduct and communication.
    Spear HJ
    Nurse Author Ed; 2004; 14(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 15551686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Scientific misconduct, mistakes or something in between?].
    Levi R
    Lakartidningen; 2006 Apr 12-25; 103(15-16):1203-5. PubMed ID: 16696201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consider the source.
    Mason DJ
    Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reviewing a reviewer.
    Fokin AA
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Mar; 35(3):383-4. PubMed ID: 19196519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific research and the human condition.
    Perez Velazquez JL
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6918):13. PubMed ID: 12511929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standards for ethical publication.
    Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Rudy SF; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2007; 28(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17162121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Authors, industry, and review articles.
    DeMaria AN
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Mar; 43(6):1130-1. PubMed ID: 15028380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Authorship.
    Watts C
    Surg Neurol; 2009 Jul; 72(1):99. PubMed ID: 19559939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Commentary on Long T, Fallon, D (2007) Ethics approval, guarantees of quality and the meddlesome editor. Journal of Clinical Nursing 16, 1398-1404.
    Watson R
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Jun; 17(11):1534-5. PubMed ID: 18482151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time.
    Clarke SP
    Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.