These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11500990)

  • 1. Fast realistic modeling in bioelectromagnetism using lead-field interpolation.
    Yvert B; Crouzeix-Cheylus A; Pernier J
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2001 Sep; 14(1):48-63. PubMed ID: 11500990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapidly recomputable EEG forward models for realistic head shapes.
    Ermer JJ; Mosher JC; Baillet S; Leah RM
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Apr; 46(4):1265-81. PubMed ID: 11324964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Generalized head models for MEG/EEG: boundary element method beyond nested volumes.
    Kybic J; Clerc M; Faugeras O; Keriven R; Papadopoulo T
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1333-46. PubMed ID: 16481698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bioelectromagnetic forward problem: isolated source approach revis(it)ed.
    Stenroos M; Sarvas J
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(11):3517-35. PubMed ID: 22581305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An advanced boundary element method (BEM) implementation for the forward problem of electromagnetic source imaging.
    Akalin-Acar Z; Gençer NG
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Nov; 49(21):5011-28. PubMed ID: 15584534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods.
    Mosher JC; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Mar; 46(3):245-59. PubMed ID: 10097460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Symmetric BEM formulation for the M/EEG forward problem.
    Adde G; Clerc M; Faugeras O; Keriven R; Kybic J; Papadopoulo T
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18():524-35. PubMed ID: 15344485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linear inverse solutions: simulations from a realistic head model in MEG.
    Soufflet L; Boeijinga PH
    Brain Topogr; 2005; 18(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 16341577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG measurements to tissue conductivity.
    Gençer NG; Acar CE
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(5):701-17. PubMed ID: 15070197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An improved boundary element method for realistic volume-conductor modeling.
    Fuchs M; Drenckhahn R; Wischmann HA; Wagner M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Aug; 45(8):980-97. PubMed ID: 9691573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fast multipole acceleration of the MEG/EEG boundary element method.
    Kybic J; Clerc M; Faugeras O; Keriven R; Papadopoulo T
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4695-710. PubMed ID: 16177498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The adjoint method for general EEG and MEG sensor-based lead field equations.
    Vallaghé S; Papadopoulo T; Clerc M
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(1):135-47. PubMed ID: 19075359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Method for Solving the MEG and the Combined MEG/EEG Forward Problem.
    Piastra MC; Nüßing A; Vorwerk J; Bornfleth H; Oostenveld R; Engwer C; Wolters CH
    Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():30. PubMed ID: 29456487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A realistic, accurate and fast source modeling approach for the EEG forward problem.
    Miinalainen T; Rezaei A; Us D; Nüßing A; Engwer C; Wolters CH; Pursiainen S
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():56-67. PubMed ID: 30165251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Volume currents in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
    Van Uitert R; Weinstein D; Johnson C
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2003 Jan; 31(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12572653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of volume conductor and source models to localize epileptic foci.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 24(2):101-19. PubMed ID: 17414966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct reconstruction algorithm of current dipoles for vector magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
    Nara T; Oohama J; Hashimoto M; Takeda T; Ando S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3859-79. PubMed ID: 17664582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effect of boundary element discretization on forward calculation and the inverse problem in electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography].
    Haueisen J; Böttner A; Funke M; Brauer H; Nowak H
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997 Sep; 42(9):240-8. PubMed ID: 9410154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.