These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11501440)

  • 1. The influence of actuarial risk assessment in clinical judgments and tribunal decisions about mentally disordered offenders in maximum security.
    Hilton NZ; Simmons JL
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Aug; 25(4):393-408. PubMed ID: 11501440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The increasing influence of risk assessment on forensic patient review board decisions.
    Hilton NZ; Simpson AI; Ham E
    Psychol Serv; 2016 Aug; 13(3):223-231. PubMed ID: 27504642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving forensic tribunal decisions: the role of the clinician.
    McKee SA; Harris GT; Rice ME
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):485-506. PubMed ID: 17620273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of confidence on the accuracy of structured professional and actuarial violence risk judgments in a sample of forensic psychiatric patients.
    Douglas KS; Ogloff JR
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Dec; 27(6):573-87. PubMed ID: 14724957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding Clinicians' Use of Cues When Assessing the Future Risk of Violence: A Clinical Judgement Analysis in the Psychiatric Setting.
    Brown B; Rakow T
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2016; 23(2):125-41. PubMed ID: 25652696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Actuarial prediction of violent recidivism in mentally disordered offenders.
    Snowden RJ; Gray NS; Taylor J; MacCulloch MJ
    Psychol Med; 2007 Nov; 37(11):1539-49. PubMed ID: 17537287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective replication of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide in predicting violent recidivism among forensic patients.
    Harris GT; Rice ME; Cormier CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Aug; 26(4):377-94. PubMed ID: 12182529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors of Mental Health Review Tribunal (MHRT) outcome in a forensic inpatient population: a prospective cohort study.
    Jewell A; Dean K; Fahy T; Cullen AE
    BMC Psychiatry; 2017 Jan; 17(1):25. PubMed ID: 28095806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a model of violence risk assessment among forensic psychiatric patients.
    Douglas KS; Ogloff JR; Hart SD
    Psychiatr Serv; 2003 Oct; 54(10):1372-9. PubMed ID: 14557523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Violence risk prediction. Clinical and actuarial measures and the role of the Psychopathy Checklist.
    Dolan M; Doyle M
    Br J Psychiatry; 2000 Oct; 177():303-11. PubMed ID: 11116770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The precarious practice of forensic psychiatric risk assessments.
    Nilsson T; Munthe C; Gustavson C; Forsman A; Anckarsäter H
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 19800123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structured versus unstructured judgment: DUNDRUM-1 compared to court decisions.
    Jeandarme I; Habets P; Kennedy H
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 64():205-210. PubMed ID: 31122631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does using nonnumerical terms to describe risk aid violence risk communication? Clinician agreement and decision making.
    Zoe Hilton N; Carter AM; Harris GT; Sharpe AJ
    J Interpers Violence; 2008 Feb; 23(2):171-88. PubMed ID: 18162635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinicians' decision making about involuntary commitment.
    Engleman NB; Jobes DA; Berman AL; Langbein LI
    Psychiatr Serv; 1998 Jul; 49(7):941-5. PubMed ID: 9661230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction versus management models relevant to risk assessment: the importance of legal decision-making context.
    Heilbrun K
    Law Hum Behav; 1997 Aug; 21(4):347-59. PubMed ID: 9335193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Valuing structured professional judgment: predictive validity, decision-making, and the clinical-actuarial conflict.
    Falzer PR
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(1):40-54. PubMed ID: 23339121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain.
    Meynen G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 23433730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recidivism and use of services among persons with mental illness after release from prison.
    Lovell D; Gagliardi GJ; Peterson PD
    Psychiatr Serv; 2002 Oct; 53(10):1290-6. PubMed ID: 12364677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors influencing treatment team recommendations to review tribunals for forensic psychiatric patients.
    Martin K; Martin E
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jul; 34(4):551-63. PubMed ID: 27147124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Violent recidivism: assessing predictive validity.
    Rice ME; Harris GT
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1995 Oct; 63(5):737-48. PubMed ID: 7593866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.