BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11501649)

  • 1. Patch testing of nickel sulfate and potassium dichromate with a standardized ready-to-use test system gives highly reproducible results: a double-blind multicentre study.
    Brasch J; Henseler T; Aberer W; Fuchs T; Hoeck U; Kreilgård B;
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2001 May; 81(2):122-4. PubMed ID: 11501649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Positive nickel patch tests do not intensify positive reactions to adjacent patch tests with dichromate. Results from a double-blind multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
    Brasch J; Kreilgård B; Henseler T; Aberer W; Fuchs T; Pflüger R; Hoeck U; Gefeller O
    Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Sep; 43(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 10985630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increased sensitivity of patch testing by standardized tape stripping beforehand: a multicentre diagnostic accuracy study.
    Dickel H; Kreft B; Kuss O; Worm M; Soost S; Brasch J; Pfützner W; Grabbe J; Angelova-Fischer I; Elsner P; Fluhr J; Altmeyer P; Geier J
    Contact Dermatitis; 2010 May; 62(5):294-302. PubMed ID: 20536477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Oral prednisone suppresses allergic but not irritant patch test reactions in individuals hypersensitive to nickel.
    Anveden I; Lindberg M; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Isaksson M; Liden C; Sommerlund M; Wahlberg JE; Wilkinson JD; Willis CM
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):298-303. PubMed ID: 15209811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing reliabilities of strip and conventional patch testing.
    Dickel H; Geier J; Kreft B; Pfützner W; Kuss O
    Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Jun; 76(6):342-349. PubMed ID: 28271532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cobalt allergy: suitable test concentration, and concomitant reactivity to nickel and chromium.
    Lidén C; Andersson N; Julander A; Matura M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2016 Jun; 74(6):360-7. PubMed ID: 26996152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patch test reactivity to metal allergens following regulatory interventions: a 33-year retrospective study.
    Thyssen JP; Ross-Hansen K; Menné T; Johansen JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Aug; 63(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20629675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental patch testing with chromium-coated materials.
    Bregnbak D; Thyssen JP; Jellesen MS; Zachariae C; Johansen JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Jun; 76(6):333-341. PubMed ID: 28120332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantification of allergic and irritant patch test reactions using ImageJ.
    Ohshima H; Kinoshita S; Futagawa M; Takiwaki H; Washizaki K; Ishiko A; Kanto H
    Skin Res Technol; 2014 May; 20(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 24118475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproducibility of irritant patch test reactions to sodium lauryl sulfate in a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study using clinical scoring. Results from a study group of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
    Brasch J; Becker D; Effendy I
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Sep; 41(3):150-5. PubMed ID: 10475514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasound for assessment of allergic and irritant patch test reactions.
    Serup J; Staberg B
    Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Aug; 17(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 3308312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Skin reactivity in subjects sensitive to different concentrations of nickel, chromium and cobalt].
    Piela Z; Kieć-Swierczyńska M
    Med Pr; 1998; 49(5):457-63. PubMed ID: 9919605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patch testing reactions to a standard series in 608 patients tested from 1990 to 1997 at Massachusetts General Hospital.
    Albert MR; González S; González E
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Dec; 9(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 9810020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strip patch test vs. conventional patch test: investigation of dose-dependent test sensitivities in nickel- and chromium-sensitive subjects.
    Dickel H; Kamphowe J; Geier J; Altmeyer P; Kuss O
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2009 Sep; 23(9):1018-25. PubMed ID: 19470058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hypersensitivity to metals in orthodontics.
    Menezes LM; Campos LC; Quintão CC; Bolognese AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 15224060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducibility of patch test results: a concurrent right-versus-left study using TRUE Test.
    Ale SI; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 15209812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The reproducibility of nickel, cobalt and chromate sensitization in patients tested at least twice in the period 1992-2014 with TRUE Test®.
    Schaeffer AC; Andersen KE; Bindslev-Jensen C; Mortz CG
    Contact Dermatitis; 2016 Aug; 75(2):111-3. PubMed ID: 27385519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patch-test reaction patterns in patients with a predisposition to atopic dermatitis.
    Brasch J; Schnuch A; Uter W
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Oct; 49(4):197-201. PubMed ID: 14996068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Value of patch testing in atopic dermatitis.
    el Samahy MH; el-Kerdani T
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):154-7. PubMed ID: 9249284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reactivity to patch tests with nickel sulfate and fragrance mix in infants.
    Jøhnke H; Norberg LA; Vach W; Bindslev-Jensen C; Høst A; Andersen KE
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):141-7. PubMed ID: 15479203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.