These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. NLRB's St. Francis decision signals broader-based bargaining units. Furlane ME; Freeman CA Health Prog; 1985 May; 66(4):50-3. PubMed ID: 10271499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of NLRB rulings on collective bargaining by hospital pharmacists. Greenberg RB; Ross RS Am J Hosp Pharm; 1977 May; 34(5):541-4. PubMed ID: 868892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Appropriate health care bargaining units: an unsettled question. Pepe SP Hosp Prog; 1977 Jan; 58(1):54-8, 70. PubMed ID: 832871 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Judicial review of NLRB rulemaking in the health care industry: implications for labor and management. Redle DA; Rakich JS Employee Relat Law J; 1990-1991 Winter; 16(3):333-6. PubMed ID: 10108860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Union elections and the NLRB. The healthcare industry continues to challenge bargaining unit determinations. Zimmerman DA; King GR Health Prog; 1990; 71(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 10103410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hospital labor scene marked by union issues. Metzger N Hospitals; 1980 Apr; 54(7):105-6, 108, 111-2. PubMed ID: 7358350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. NLRB proposed rules for determining health care bargaining units. Campbell RA Employee Relat Law J; 1989; 14(4):627-32. PubMed ID: 10295813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Collective bargaining in the health care industry. Van Cleve WJ J Am Diet Assoc; 1972 Dec; 61(6):633-6. PubMed ID: 4634473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. NLRB enunciates two-tier test for determining appropriateness of bargaining units in health care field. Hofstra PS Health Law Vigil; 1983 Jan; 6(2):3-5. PubMed ID: 10257913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Collective bargaining: a new frontier for hospitals. Miller RL Hosp Prog; 1975 Feb; 56(2):58-60, 65. PubMed ID: 1110067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Taft-Hartley amended: implications for nursing. The industrial model. Zimmerman A Am J Nurs; 1975 Feb; 75(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 1037797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Taft-Hartley: what to expect. Phillips DF Hospitals; 1974 Jul; 48(13):18a-18d. PubMed ID: 4838928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The NLRB's proposed rule for the determination of health care bargaining units: is the AHA barking up the wrong tree? Murphy B Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1992 May; (159):7-30. PubMed ID: 10119023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. NLRB ruling is final: all RN unit to be presumed appropriate. Boisvert SC Maine Nurse; 1989; 75():8. PubMed ID: 2733457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Physician unions: any doctor can join, but who can bargain collectively? Sobal LV; Hepner JO Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1990; 35(3):327-40. PubMed ID: 10106916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of the director of nursing in collective bargaining. Morgan DM Can Hosp; 1973 Jan; 50(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 4778065 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Health care institution labor law: case law developments, 1974-78. Shepard IM Am J Law Med; 1978; 4(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 685982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nurses and the new NLRB rules. Implications for healthcare management. Hepner JO; Zinner SE Health Prog; 1991 Oct; 72(8):20-2. PubMed ID: 10112969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New demands of nurses. I. Phillips DF Hospitals; 1974 Aug; 48(16):31-4. PubMed ID: 4853340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]