BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11502143)

  • 1. A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care: labour and birth outcomes.
    Benjamin Y; Walsh D; Taub N
    Midwifery; 2001 Sep; 17(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 11502143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomised study of midwifery caseload care and traditional 'shared-care'.
    North Staffordshire Changing Childbirth Research Team
    Midwifery; 2000 Dec; 16(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 11080465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antenatal, delivery and postnatal comparisons of maternal satisfaction with two pilot Changing Childbirth schemes compared with a traditional model of care.
    Spurgeon P; Hicks C; Barwell F
    Midwifery; 2001 Jun; 17(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 11399133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Continuity of care in maternity services: women's views of one team midwifery scheme.
    Farquhar M; Camilleri-Ferrante C; Todd C
    Midwifery; 2000 Mar; 16(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 11139860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.
    Kataoka Y; Eto H; Iida M
    Midwifery; 2013 Aug; 29(8):965-72. PubMed ID: 23415360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring the effect of hospital admission on contraction patterns and labour outcomes using women's perceptions of events.
    Walsh TC
    Midwifery; 2009 Jun; 25(3):242-52. PubMed ID: 17624645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reducing length of stay for women who present as outpatients to delivery suite: A clinical practice improvement project.
    Haxton J; Fahy K
    Women Birth; 2009 Dec; 22(4):119-27. PubMed ID: 19570735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Care and environment in midwife-led and obstetric-led units: a comparison of mothers' and birth partners' perceptions.
    Symon AG; Dugard P; Butchart M; Carr V; Paul J
    Midwifery; 2011 Dec; 27(6):880-6. PubMed ID: 21251736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of the birthplace and models of care on midwifery practice for the management of women in labour.
    Freeman LM; Adair V; Timperley H; West SH
    Women Birth; 2006 Dec; 19(4):97-105. PubMed ID: 17070742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trial.
    McLachlan HL; Forster DA; Davey MA; Farrell T; Gold L; Biro MA; Albers L; Flood M; Oats J; Waldenström U
    BJOG; 2012 Nov; 119(12):1483-92. PubMed ID: 22830446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are there inequalities in choice of birthing position? Sociodemographic and labour factors associated with the supine position during the second stage of labour.
    de Jonge A; Rijnders ME; van Diem MT; Scheepers PL; Lagro-Janssen AL
    Midwifery; 2009 Aug; 25(4):439-48. PubMed ID: 18082298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the outcomes of partnership caseload midwifery and standard hospital care in low risk mothers.
    Johnson M; Stewart H; Langdon R; Kelly P; Yong L
    Aust J Adv Nurs; 2005; 22(3):21-7. PubMed ID: 16499237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Midwife attendance during labour and its relation to interventions and outcome of birth].
    Ayerle GM; Hecker H; Frömke C; Hillemanns P; Gross MM
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):176-82. PubMed ID: 18956275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical outcomes of the first midwife-led normal birth unit in China: a retrospective cohort study.
    Cheung NF; Mander R; Wang X; Fu W; Zhou H; Zhang L
    Midwifery; 2011 Oct; 27(5):582-7. PubMed ID: 21236528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does continuity of carer matter to women from minority ethnic groups?
    McCourt C; Pearce A
    Midwifery; 2000 Jun; 16(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 11151550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Midwife interactions with birth support people in Melbourne, Australia.
    Maher J
    Midwifery; 2004 Sep; 20(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 15337283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Place of birth and satisfaction with childbirth in Belgium and the Netherlands.
    Christiaens W; Bracke P
    Midwifery; 2009 Apr; 25(2):e11-9. PubMed ID: 17512100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of labour and birth experiences of women delivering in a birthing centre and at home in the Netherlands.
    Borquez HA; Wiegers TA
    Midwifery; 2006 Dec; 22(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 16647170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of timing of admission in labour and management of labour on method of birth: results from a randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery (COSMOS trial).
    Davey MA; McLachlan HL; Forster D; Flood M
    Midwifery; 2013 Dec; 29(12):1297-302. PubMed ID: 23890679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Midwifery group practice and mode of birth.
    Beckmann M; Kildea S; Gibbons K
    Women Birth; 2012 Dec; 25(4):187-93. PubMed ID: 22169396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 118.