185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11503920)
1. Assessment of a new logistic model in the preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Errasti T; Laparte C; Jurado M; López-García G
J Ultrasound Med; 2001 Aug; 20(8):841-8. PubMed ID: 11503920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the risk of malignancy index and self-constructed logistic regression models in preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses.
Yörük P; Dündar O; Yildizhan B; Tütüncü L; Pekin T
J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Oct; 27(10):1469-77. PubMed ID: 18809957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of methods for preoperative discrimination between malignant and benign adnexal masses: the development of a new logistic regression model.
Timmerman D; Bourne TH; Tailor A; Collins WP; Verrelst H; Vandenberghe K; Vergote I
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 181(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 10411796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China.
Chen H; Qian L; Jiang M; Du Q; Yuan F; Feng W
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):815-822. PubMed ID: 31152572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unilocular adnexal cysts with papillary projections but no other solid components: is there a diagnostic method that can classify them reliably as benign or malignant before surgery?
Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):570-81. PubMed ID: 22915541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Artificial neural network models for the preoperative discrimination between malignant and benign adnexal masses.
Timmerman D; Verrelst H; Bourne TH; De Moor B; Collins WP; Vergote I; Vandewalle J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jan; 13(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 10201082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distinguishing the benign and malignant adnexal mass: an external validation of prognostic models.
Mol BW; Boll D; De Kanter M; Heintz AP; Sijmons EA; Oei SG; Bal H; Brölmann HA
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Feb; 80(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 11161854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; López-García G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 17(5):434-8. PubMed ID: 11380970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. External validation of mathematical models to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal tumors: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group.
Van Holsbeke C; Van Calster B; Valentin L; Testa AC; Ferrazzi E; Dimou I; Lu C; Moerman P; Van Huffel S; Vergote I; Timmerman D;
Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Aug; 13(15 Pt 1):4440-7. PubMed ID: 17671128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional power Doppler vascular sampling: a new method for predicting ovarian cancer in vascularized complex adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Mercé LT; García Manero M
J Ultrasound Med; 2005 May; 24(5):689-96. PubMed ID: 15840800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Color Doppler energy prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using logistic regression models.
Marret H; Ecochard R; Giraudeau B; Golfier F; Raudrant D; Lansac J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 12493050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and validation of a model that includes two ultrasound parameters and the plasma D-dimer level for predicting malignancy in adnexal masses: an observational study.
Stukan M; Badocha M; Ratajczak K
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):564. PubMed ID: 31185938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Auekitrungrueng R; Tinnangwattana D; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Wanapirak C; Tongsong T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 146(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 31206642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. External validation of diagnostic models to estimate the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses.
Van Holsbeke C; Van Calster B; Bourne T; Ajossa S; Testa AC; Guerriero S; Fruscio R; Lissoni AA; Czekierdowski A; Savelli L; Van Huffel S; Valentin L; Timmerman D
Clin Cancer Res; 2012 Feb; 18(3):815-25. PubMed ID: 22114135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Artificial neural network computer prediction of ovarian malignancy in women with adnexal masses.
Szpurek D; Moszynski R; Smolen A; Sajdak S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 May; 89(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 15847872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The estimation of the probability of tumor malignacy on the basis of test combination in the primary diagnosis of adnexal tumors].
Smoleń A; Stachowicz N; Czekierowski A; Kotarski J
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Apr; 81(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 20476596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mathematical models to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses: potential diagnostic improvement using ovarian HistoScanning.
Vaes E; Manchanda R; Nir R; Nir D; Bleiberg H; Autier P; Menon U; Robert A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Jan; 21(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 21330829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk of malignancy index for adnexal masses.
Akdeniz N; Kuyumcuoğlu U; Kale A; Erdemoğlu M; Caca F
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2009; 30(2):178-80. PubMed ID: 19480249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
