1501 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11504077)
1. Evaluation of head and neck cancer with 18F-FDG PET: a comparison with conventional methods.
Kresnik E; Mikosch P; Gallowitsch HJ; Kogler D; Wiesser S; Heinisch M; Unterweger O; Raunik W; Kumnig G; Gomez I; Grünbacher G; Lind P
Eur J Nucl Med; 2001 Jul; 28(7):816-21. PubMed ID: 11504077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of head and neck cancer with (18)F-FDG PET: a comparison with conventional methods.
Kresnik E; Mikosch P; Gallowitsch H; Kogler D; Wieser S; Heinisch M; Unterweger O; Raunik W; Kumnig G; Gomez I; Grünbacher G; Lind P
Eur J Nucl Med; 2001 Jul; 28(7):816-21. PubMed ID: 24770459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (MRI, CT, and 67Ga scintigraphy) in assessment of combined intraarterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy for head and neck carcinoma.
Kitagawa Y; Nishizawa S; Sano K; Ogasawara T; Nakamura M; Sadato N; Yoshida M; Yonekura Y
J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 12571209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of unknown primary tumours and distant metastases in patients with cervical metastases: value of FDG-PET versus conventional modalities.
Regelink G; Brouwer J; de Bree R; Pruim J; van der Laan BF; Vaalburg W; Hoekstra OS; Comans EF; Vissink A; Leemans CR; Roodenburg JL
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1024-30. PubMed ID: 12173016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [18F]FDG imaging of head and neck tumours: comparison of hybrid PET and morphological methods.
Dresel S; Grammerstorff J; Schwenzer K; Brinkbäumer K; Schmid R; Pfluger T; Hahn K
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Jul; 30(7):995-1003. PubMed ID: 12739070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Results of pretherapeutic lymph node diagnosis in head and neck tumors. Clinical value of 18-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)].
Di Martino E; Nowak B; Krombach GA; Sellhaus B; Hausmann R; Cremerius U; Büll U; Westhofen M
Laryngorhinootologie; 2000 Apr; 79(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 10838683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (CT, MRI, US) in lymph node staging of head and neck cancer.
Adams S; Baum RP; Stuckensen T; Bitter K; Hör G
Eur J Nucl Med; 1998 Sep; 25(9):1255-60. PubMed ID: 9724374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preoperative assessment of cervical lymph nodes in head and neck cancer with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose using a dual-head coincidence camera: a pilot study.
Stokkel MP; ten Broek FW; van Rijk PP
Eur J Nucl Med; 1999 May; 26(5):499-503. PubMed ID: 10382094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. FDG-PET delayed imaging for the detection of head and neck cancer recurrence after radio-chemotherapy: comparison with MRI/CT.
Kubota K; Yokoyama J; Yamaguchi K; Ono S; Qureshy A; Itoh M; Fukuda H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Apr; 31(4):590-5. PubMed ID: 14722678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/CT examination in the diagnosis of head and neck cancer--preliminary results].
Kuźmińska M; Osuch-Wójcikiewicz E; Fronczewska-Wieniawska K; Królicki L; Niemczyk K
Otolaryngol Pol; 2011 Sep; 65(5 Suppl):17-21. PubMed ID: 22000246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic evaluation of malignant head and neck cancer by F-18-FDG PET compared to CT/MRI.
Nowak B; Di Martino E; Jänicke S; Cremerius U; Adam G; Zimny M; Reinartz P; Büll U
Nuklearmedizin; 1999; 38(8):312-8. PubMed ID: 10615664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of [18F]-2-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography on previously untreated head and neck cancer patients.
Fleming AJ; Smith SP; Paul CM; Hall NC; Daly BT; Agrawal A; Schuller DE
Laryngoscope; 2007 Jul; 117(7):1173-9. PubMed ID: 17603315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to evaluate cervical node metastases in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
Kyzas PA; Evangelou E; Denaxa-Kyza D; Ioannidis JP
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(10):712-20. PubMed ID: 18477804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Correlation of FDG-PET and MRI/CT with histopathology in primary diagnosis, lymph node staging and diagnosis of recurrency of head and neck cancer].
Pöpperl G; Lang S; Dagdelen O; Jäger L; Tiling R; Hahn K; Tatsch K
Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):714-20. PubMed ID: 12063600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography in the diagnosis of tumor recurrence and metastases in the follow-up of patients with breast carcinoma: a comparison to conventional imaging.
Gallowitsch HJ; Kresnik E; Gasser J; Kumnig G; Igerc I; Mikosch P; Lind P
Invest Radiol; 2003 May; 38(5):250-6. PubMed ID: 12750613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing the neck after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for Locoregional advanced head and neck cancer.
Ong SC; Schöder H; Lee NY; Patel SG; Carlson D; Fury M; Pfister DG; Shah JP; Larson SM; Kraus DH
J Nucl Med; 2008 Apr; 49(4):532-40. PubMed ID: 18344440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR replace sentinel lymph node resection in malignant melanoma?
Schaarschmidt BM; Grueneisen J; Stebner V; Klode J; Stoffels I; Umutlu L; Schadendorf D; Heusch P; Antoch G; Pöppel TD
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Nov; 45(12):2093-2102. PubMed ID: 29876618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical utility of F-18 FDG PET/CT in recurrent breast carcinoma.
Manohar K; Mittal BR; Senthil R; Kashyap R; Bhattacharya A; Singh G
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Jun; 33(6):591-6. PubMed ID: 22334135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Current status of nuclear medicine clinical application of FDG-PET for cancer diagnosis. Head and neck cancer].
Nakasone Y; Mogi K; Endo K
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 May; 62(6):258-64. PubMed ID: 12073631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 18F-FDG PET/CT as a staging procedure in primary stage II and III breast cancer: comparison with conventional imaging techniques.
Koolen BB; Vrancken Peeters MJ; Aukema TS; Vogel WV; Oldenburg HS; van der Hage JA; Hoefnagel CA; Stokkel MP; Loo CE; Rodenhuis S; Rutgers EJ; Valdés Olmos RA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Jan; 131(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 21935602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
