These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1150417)

  • 1. Pragmatists & doctrinaires.
    Fletcher J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1975 Jun; 5(3):36-7. PubMed ID: 1150417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A bias for life.
    Siegel S
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1975 Jun; 5(3):23-5. PubMed ID: 1150413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical considerations in fetal research.
    Mahoney MJ
    Conn Med; 1977 Feb; 41(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 837677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. AAP code of ethics for the use of fetuses and fetal material for research.
    Hodes HL; Brown RH; Holliday MA; James LS; Katcher AL; Katz SL; Sparling D; Yaffe SJ; Kretchmer N
    Pediatrics; 1975 Aug; 56(2):304-5. PubMed ID: 1172228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal research: response to the recommendations.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1975 Oct; 5(5):9-16. PubMed ID: 1184378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethics of research and the pregnant patient.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Curr Womens Health Rep; 2003 Dec; 3(6):505-9. PubMed ID: 14613673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical experimentation on captive populations in the United States.
    Perper JA
    J Forensic Sci; 1974 Jul; 19(3):557-60. PubMed ID: 4853143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal experimentation: protocols, propriety and parameters.
    Meechan CM
    Queens Law J; 1985; 11(1):166-97. PubMed ID: 11659023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protection of human subjects.
    United States
    Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion and research.
    Lappe M
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1975 Jun; 5(3):21. PubMed ID: 1150412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Issues in human experimentation.
    Howard D
    Am J Med Sci; 1972 Nov; 264(5):349-52. PubMed ID: 4650127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Informed consent: the FDA's perspective.
    Bagley G
    Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 11653141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human experimentation: adding insult to injury.
    Rosenberg K
    Health PAC Bull; 1979; (81-82):2, 43-7. PubMed ID: 10240887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Final rule on additional protections for women.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2002 Jan; 17(1):3. PubMed ID: 16270436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Challenges in human subject protection.
    Nightingale SL
    Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 10343016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical research: facing down the ethical dilemmas.
    Grandinetti D
    Med Econ; 1997 Dec; 74(25):80, 84-6. PubMed ID: 10175869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Public confidence in public health research ethics.
    Mariner WK
    Public Health Rep; 1997; 112(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 9018285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Informed patient consent: a historical perspective.
    Dowd SB; Wilson B
    Radiol Technol; 1995; 67(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 8570838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The entitlement of Veterans Affairs medical patients to vulnerable population status for human medical research.
    McGuire ER
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1992; 2(2):259-301. PubMed ID: 10124880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. More tales from institutional review boards.
    Neuhauser D
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1994; 4(1):153-8. PubMed ID: 10142174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.