These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11504432)

  • 1. Pulpal inflammatory responses following non-carious class V restorations.
    About I; Murray PE; Franquin JC; Remusat M; Smith AJ
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 11504432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cavity remaining dentin thickness and pulpal activity.
    Murray PE; About I; Lumley PJ; Franquin JC; Remusat M; Smith AJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 12074229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of hierarchical factors to guide clinical decision making for successful long-term pulp capping.
    Murray PE; Hafez AA; Smith AJ; Cox CF
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 12674361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pulpal response to a newly developed MMA based resin cement for bonding tooth-colored indirect restorations.
    Seki Y; Shimada Y; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17076029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biocompatibility of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement applied as pulp capping in human teeth.
    do Nascimento AB; Fontana UF; Teixeira HM; Costa CA
    Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11763899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Restorative pulpal and repair responses.
    Murray PE; About I; Franquin JC; Remusat M; Smith AJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Apr; 132(4):482-91. PubMed ID: 11315379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pulpal response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer material on nonexposed and exposed monkey pulps.
    Tarim B; Hafez AA; Cox CF
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):535-42. PubMed ID: 9807135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors influencing pulpal response to cavity restorations.
    Camps J; Déjou J; Rémusat M; About I
    Dent Mater; 2000 Nov; 16(6):432-40. PubMed ID: 10967193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interactions between cavity preparation and restoration events and their effects on pulp vitality.
    Wisithphrom K; Murray PE; About I; Windsor LJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Dec; 26(6):596-605. PubMed ID: 17243333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bacterial microleakage and pulp inflammation associated with various restorative materials.
    Murray PE; Hafez AA; Smith AJ; Cox CF
    Dent Mater; 2002 Sep; 18(6):470-8. PubMed ID: 12098576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of ZOE temporary restorations on microleakage in composite restorations.
    Yap AU; Shah KC; Loh ET; Sim SS; Tan CC
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 11933904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pulp response and cytotoxicity evaluation of 2 dentin bonding agents.
    Demarco FF; Tarquinio SB; Jaeger MM; de Araújo VC; Matson E
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 12066661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 11572296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice.
    Whitworth JM; Myers PM; Smith J; Walls AW; McCabe JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 15910477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of acid etching on the dental pulp in adhesive composite restorations.
    Fujitani M; Inokoshi S; Hosoda H
    Int Dent J; 1992 Feb; 42(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 1563819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pulpal response to adhesive resin systems applied to acid-etched vital dentin: damp versus dry primer application.
    White KC; Cox CF; Kanka J; Dixon DL; Farmer JB; Snuggs HM
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Apr; 25(4):259-68. PubMed ID: 8058899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of pulp responses to resin composites.
    Murray PE; Windsor LJ; Hafez AA; Stevenson RG; Cox CF
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 12760695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fluid flow after resin-composite restoration in extracted carious teeth.
    Banomyong D; Palamara JE; Messer HH; Burrow MF
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 19583764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.