143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11504902)
1. An ex vivo investigation into the use of a plasma arc lamp when using a visible light-cured composite and a resin-modified glass poly(alkenoate) cement in orthodontic bonding.
Pettemerides AP; Ireland AJ; Sherriff M
J Orthod; 2001 Sep; 28(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 11504902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer.
Sfondrini MF; Cacciafesta V; Pistorio A; Sfondrini G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11174537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An in vitro investigation into the use of resin-modified glass poly(alkenoate) cements as orthodontic bonding agents.
Choo SC; Ireland AJ; Sherriff M
Eur J Orthod; 2001 Jun; 23(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 11471267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Orthodontic bracket bonding with a plasma-arc light and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement.
Ishikawa H; Komori A; Kojima I; Ando F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 11455379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of light-tip distance on the shear bond strengths of resin-modified glass ionomer cured with high-intensity halogen, light-emitting diode, and plasma arc lights.
Sfondrini MF; Cacciafesta V; Scribante A; Boehme A; Jost-Brinkmann PG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):541-6. PubMed ID: 16627181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Plasma arc curing lights for orthodontic bonding.
Klocke A; Korbmacher HM; Huck LG; Kahl-Nieke B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Dec; 122(6):643-8. PubMed ID: 12490876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polymerization with a micro-xenon light of a resin-modified glass ionomer: a shear bond strength study 15 minutes after bonding.
Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Klersy C; Sfondrini G
Eur J Orthod; 2002 Dec; 24(6):689-97. PubMed ID: 12512786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative evaluation of the shear bond strength of five different orthodontic bonding agents polymerized using halogen and light-emitting diode curing lights: an in vitro investigation.
Banerjee S; Banerjee R
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(5):731-2. PubMed ID: 22406726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite.
Wilson RM; Donly KJ
Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 11447960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An ex vivo assessment of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in relation to bonding technique.
Larmour CJ; Stirrups DR
J Orthod; 2001 Sep; 28(3):207-10. PubMed ID: 11504897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive.
Lifshitz AB; Cárdenas M
World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 16779971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An in vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement and a composite adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets.
Movahhed HZ; Ogaard B; Syverud M
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 16043469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vivo investigation into the use of resin-modified glass poly(alkenote) cements as orthodontic bonding agents.
Choo SC; Ireland AJ; Sherriff M
Eur J Orthod; 2001 Aug; 23(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 11544790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bond strength of orthodontic brackets using different light and self-curing cements.
Toledano M; Osorio R; Osorio E; Romeo A; de la Higuera B; García-Godoy F
Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 12607856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An ex vivo assessment of resin-modified glass ionomer bonding systems in relation to ceramic bracket debond.
Larmour CJ; McCabe JF; Gordon PH
J Orthod; 2000 Dec; 27(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 11099572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of light-cure time on the initial shear bond strength of a glass-ionomer adhesive.
Bishara SE; VonWald L; Olsen ME; Laffoon JF; Jakobsen JR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Feb; 117(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 10672216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bond strength for orthodontic brackets contaminated by blood: composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
Reddy L; Marker VA; Ellis E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Feb; 61(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 12618999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of bond strength between orthodontic brackets bonded with halogen and plasma arc curing lights: an in-vitro and in-vivo study.
Signorelli MD; Kao E; Ngan PW; Gladwin MA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Feb; 129(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 16473722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
