577 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11505270)
21. Modeling capacity of ENDOflash files in simulated root canals.
Fariniuk LF; Baratto-Filho F; Guerisoli DM; Barbizam JV; Pécora JD; Sousa-Neto MD
Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 11210250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of cutting efficiency and instrumentation of curved canals with nickel-titanium and stainless-steel instruments.
Schäfer E; Lau R
J Endod; 1999 Jun; 25(6):427-30. PubMed ID: 10530244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study.
Gergi R; Sabbagh C
Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 17511787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Shaping ability of nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals.
Madureira RG; Forner Navarro L; Llena MC; Costa M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Feb; 109(2):e136-44. PubMed ID: 19969482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient.
Blum JY; Machtou P; Ruddle C; Micallef JP
J Endod; 2003 Sep; 29(9):567-75. PubMed ID: 14503829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
Yun HH; Kim SK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparative study of Endoflare-Hero Shaper and Mtwo NiTi instruments in the preparation of curved root canals.
Veltri M; Mollo A; Mantovani L; Pini P; Balleri P; Grandini S
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):610-6. PubMed ID: 16104974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Fracture of ProFile nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a laboratory simulation assessment.
Di Fiore PM; Genov KI; Komaroff E; Dasanayake AP; Lin L
Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):502-9. PubMed ID: 16674746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile--Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and instrumentation results in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Lohmann D
Int Endod J; 2002 Jun; 35(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 12190908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Shaping ability of Lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2.
Thompson SA; Dummer PM
J Endod; 1997 Dec; 23(12):742-7. PubMed ID: 9487850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Shaping ability of Lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1.
Thompson SA; Dummer PM
J Endod; 1997 Nov; 23(11):698-702. PubMed ID: 9587312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals.
Park H
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jun; 91(6):715-8. PubMed ID: 11402288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Shaping ability and safety of five different rotary nickel-titanium instruments compared with stainless steel hand instrumentation in simulated curved root canals.
Schirrmeister JF; Strohl C; Altenburger MJ; Wrbas KT; Hellwig E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 16731405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparison of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in apical transportation.
Javaheri HH; Javaheri GH
J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):284-6. PubMed ID: 17320715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of phase transformation on the torsional and bending properties of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments.
Miyai K; Ebihara A; Hayashi Y; Doi H; Suda H; Yoneyama T
Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 16454792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Shaping ability of four nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
Bonaccorso A; Cantatore G; Condorelli GG; Schäfer E; Tripi TR
J Endod; 2009 Jun; 35(6):883-6. PubMed ID: 19482191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [The effect of instrumentation on original apical foramen shape using steel vs niti rotatory: computerized analysis].
Gallina G; Cumbo E; Gallo P; Pizzo G; D'Angelo M
Minerva Stomatol; 2002; 51(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 11845115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
