These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

577 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11505270)

  • 41. Comparative evaluation of the preparation efficacies of HERO Shaper and Nitiflex root canal instruments in curved root canals.
    Kaptan F; Sert S; Kayahan B; Haznedaroğlu F; Tanalp J; Bayirli G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 16243253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Mechanical behaviour of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments in simulated clinical conditions: a computational study.
    Necchi S; Taschieri S; Petrini L; Migliavacca F
    Int Endod J; 2008 Nov; 41(11):939-49. PubMed ID: 19133083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Mechanical response of nickel-titanium instruments with different cross-sectional designs during shaping of simulated curved canals.
    Kim HC; Kim HJ; Lee CJ; Kim BM; Park JK; Versluis A
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jul; 42(7):593-602. PubMed ID: 19467053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Properties of endodontic hand instruments used in rotary motion. Part 3. Resistance to bending and fracture.
    Tepel J; Schäfer E; Hoppe W
    J Endod; 1997 Mar; 23(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 9594751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The LightSpeed system.
    Barbakow F
    Dent Clin North Am; 2004 Jan; 48(1):113-35. PubMed ID: 15066510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance in reciprocating and rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
    Wan J; Rasimick BJ; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    Aust Endod J; 2011 Dec; 37(3):122-7. PubMed ID: 22117719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
    Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Rotary Mtwo system versus manual K-file instruments: efficacy in preparing primary and permanent molar root canals.
    Azar MR; Mokhtare M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):363. PubMed ID: 21891918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Determination of root canal curvatures before and after canal preparation (part II): A method based on numeric calculus.
    Sonntag D; Stachniss-Carp S; Stachniss C; Stachniss V
    Aust Endod J; 2006 Apr; 32(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 16603041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 2.
    Thompson SA; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2000 May; 33(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 11307444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Study of the progressive changes in canal shape after using different instruments by hand in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Ding-ming H; Hong-xia L; Cheung GS; Lan Z; Hong T; Xue-dong Z
    J Endod; 2007 Aug; 33(8):986-9. PubMed ID: 17878089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Canal shapes produced sequentially during instrumentation with Quantec LX rotary nickel-titanium instruments: a study in simulated canals.
    Griffiths IT; Bryant ST; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2000 Jul; 33(4):346-54. PubMed ID: 11307210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
    J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 23321246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the efficacy of manual and automated instrumentation of root canals.
    Schäfer E; Zapke K
    J Endod; 2000 Nov; 26(11):660-4. PubMed ID: 11469296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A comparison of the shaping effects of 5 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Ersev H; Yilmaz B; Ciftçioğlu E; Ozkarsli SF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e86-93. PubMed ID: 20416526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation.
    Guelzow A; Stamm O; Martus P; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):743-52. PubMed ID: 16164689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A comparison of stainless steel Flexofiles and nickel-titanium NiTiFlex files during the shaping of simulated canals.
    Bishop K; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 1997 Jan; 30(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 9477791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Preparation of severely curved simulated root canals using engine-driven rotary and conventional hand instruments.
    Szep S; Gerhardt T; Leitzbach C; Lüder W; Heidemann D
    Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar; 5(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 11355093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Anatomic Endodontic Technology (AET)--a crown-down root canal preparation technique: basic concepts, operative procedure and instruments.
    Riitano F
    Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):575-87. PubMed ID: 16011778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.