These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
29. Effect of a combined gamma irradiation and Parylene plasma treatment on the hydrolytic degradation of synthetic biodegradable sutures. Zhang L; Chu CC; Loh IH J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Nov; 27(11):1425-41. PubMed ID: 8263005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Strength retention properties of self-reinforced poly L-lactide (SR-PLLA) sutures compared with polyglyconate (Maxon) and polydioxanone (PDS) sutures. An in vitro study. Mäkelä P; Pohjonen T; Törmälä P; Waris T; Ashammakhi N Biomaterials; 2002 Jun; 23(12):2587-92. PubMed ID: 12033607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Strength retention of chromic gut and monofilament synthetic absorbable suture materials in joint tissues. Walton M Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 May; (242):303-10. PubMed ID: 2495876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Torsion of monofilament and polyfilament sutures under tension decreases suture strength and increases risk of suture fracture. Hennessey DB; Carey E; Simms CK; Hanly A; Winter DC J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Aug; 12():168-73. PubMed ID: 22762905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Analysis of the fracture morphology of polyamide, polyester, polypropylene, and silk sutures before and after implantation in vivo. Karaca E; Hockenberger AS J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2008 Nov; 87(2):580-9. PubMed ID: 18506829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Breaking strength and diameter of absorbable sutures after in vivo exposure in the rat. Outlaw KK; Vela AR; O'Leary JP Am Surg; 1998 Apr; 64(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9544148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An in-vitro study of the effect of buffer on the degradation of poly(glycolic acid) sutures. Chu CC J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Jan; 15(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 6294120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for intradermal skin closure in cats. Papazoglou LG; Tsioli V; Papaioannou N; Georgiadis M; Savvas I; Prassinos N; Kouti V; Bikiaris D; Hadzigiannakis C; Zavros N Can Vet J; 2010 Jul; 51(7):770-2. PubMed ID: 20885834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison between absorbable and nonabsorbable, monofilament sutures for end-to-end arterial anastomoses in growing pigs. Steen S; Andersson L; Löwenhielm P; Stridbeck H; Walther B; Holmin T Surgery; 1984 Feb; 95(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 6420918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]