These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11506343)

  • 21. Logical implications of applying the principles of population genetics to the interpretation of DNA profiling evidence.
    Triggs CM; Buckleton JS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2002 Aug; 128(3):108-14. PubMed ID: 12175788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Probabilistic reasoning in the law. Part 2: Assessment of probabilities and explanation of the value of trace evidence other than DNA.
    Taroni F; Aitken CG
    Sci Justice; 1998; 38(3):179-88. PubMed ID: 9800433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Issues in the application of Bayes' Theorem to child abuse decision making.
    Proeve M
    Child Maltreat; 2009 Feb; 14(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 18495947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Applied forensic epidemiology: the Bayesian evaluation of forensic evidence in vehicular homicide investigation.
    Freeman MD; Rossignol AM; Hand ML
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2009 Feb; 16(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 19135003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions. Part II: Evaluation of biological traces considering activity level propositions.
    Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102186. PubMed ID: 31677444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Epidemiology visualized: the prosecutor's fallacy.
    Westreich D; Iliinsky N
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 May; 179(9):1125-7. PubMed ID: 24607595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating forensic biology results given source level propositions.
    Taylor D; Abarno D; Hicks T; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():54-67. PubMed ID: 26720813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Post-conviction DNA testing: the UK's first 'exoneration' case?
    Johnson P; Williams R
    Sci Justice; 2004; 44(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 15112595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Commentary on: Thompson WC, Taroni F, Aitken CGG. How the probability of a false positive affects the value of DNA evidence. J Forensic Sci 2003;48(1):47-54.
    Brenner CH; Inman K
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jan; 49(1):192-3; author reply 194-5. PubMed ID: 14979377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of relatedness on likelihood ratios and the use of conservative estimates.
    Brookfield JF
    Genetica; 1995; 96(1-2):13-9. PubMed ID: 7607450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The calculation of DNA match probabilities in mixed race populations.
    Triggs C; Harbison SA; Buckleton J
    Sci Justice; 2000; 40(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 10795427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Commentary on: Thompson WC, Taroni F, Aitken CGG. How the probability of a false positive affects the value of DNA evidence. J Forensic Sci 2003;48(1):47-54.
    Cotton RW; Word CJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1200; author reply 1202. PubMed ID: 14535702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Object-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensic DNA profiling problems.
    Dawid AP; Mortera J; Vicard P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jul; 169(2-3):195-205. PubMed ID: 17055679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Lay understanding of forensic statistics: Evaluation of random match probabilities, likelihood ratios, and verbal equivalents.
    Thompson WC; Newman EJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Aug; 39(4):332-49. PubMed ID: 25984887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Appealing statistics.
    Donnelly P
    Med Sci Law; 2007 Jan; 47(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 17345883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Commentary on: Thompson WC, Taroni F, Aitken CGG. How the probability of a false positive affects the value of DNA evidence. J Forensic Sci 2003 Jan.;48(1):47-54.
    Clarke GW
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1201; author reply 1202. PubMed ID: 14535703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. DNA evidence: wrong answers or wrong questions?
    Robertson B; Vignaux GA
    Genetica; 1995; 96(1-2):145-52. PubMed ID: 7607452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of forensic findings when alternative explanations have different likelihoods-"Blame-the-brother"-syndrome.
    Nordgaard A; Hedell R; Ansell R
    Sci Justice; 2012 Dec; 52(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 23068773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. U.S. panel seeking restriction on use of DNA in courts.
    Kolata G
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, C7. PubMed ID: 11646944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Applications of the Dirichlet distribution to forensic match probabilities.
    Lange K
    Genetica; 1995; 96(1-2):107-17. PubMed ID: 7607447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.