These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11506442)

  • 1. Competitive adsorption of proteins on hydrogel contact lenses.
    Sariri R; Sabbaghzadeh R
    CLAO J; 2001 Jul; 27(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 11506442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lysozyme sorption in hydrogel contact lenses.
    Garrett Q; Garrett RW; Milthorpe BK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Apr; 40(5):897-903. PubMed ID: 10102286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Kinetics of Competitive Adsorption between Lysozyme and Lactoferrin on Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses and the Effect on Lysozyme Activity.
    Hall B; Jones L; Forrest JA
    Curr Eye Res; 2015 May; 40(6):622-31. PubMed ID: 25251834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro adsorption of tear proteins to hydroxyethyl methacrylate-based contact lens materials.
    Carney FP; Morris CA; Milthorpe B; Flanagan JL; Willcox MD
    Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Nov; 35(6):320-8. PubMed ID: 19816183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro deposition of lysozyme on etafilcon A and balafilcon A hydrogel contact lenses: effects on adhesion and survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus.
    Zhang S; Borazjani RN; Salamone JC; Ahearn DG; Crow SA; Pierce GE
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2005 Sep; 28(3):113-9. PubMed ID: 16318841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization of protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. IV. Comparison of in vivo spoilage with the in vitro adsorption of tear proteins.
    Castillo EJ; Koenig JL; Anderson JM
    Biomaterials; 1986 Mar; 7(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 2423146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biological and Clinical Implications of Lysozyme Deposition on Soft Contact Lenses.
    Omali NB; Subbaraman LN; Coles-Brennan C; Fadli Z; Jones LW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Jul; 92(7):750-7. PubMed ID: 26002002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extraction versus in situ techniques for measuring surface-adsorbed lysozyme.
    Hall B; Phan CM; Subbaraman L; Jones LW; Forrest J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Sep; 91(9):1062-70. PubMed ID: 25083835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wettability of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in the presence of tear-film components.
    Cheng L; Muller SJ; Radke CJ
    Curr Eye Res; 2004 Feb; 28(2):93-108. PubMed ID: 14972715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of surface treatment on hydrophobicity, protein adsorption and microbial colonisation of silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Santos L; Rodrigues D; Lira M; Oliveira ME; Oliveira R; Vilar EY; Azeredo J
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Jul; 30(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 17291818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ex vivo protein deposition on bi-weekly silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Boone A; Heynen M; Joyce E; Varikooty J; Jones L
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Nov; 86(11):1241-9. PubMed ID: 19770811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Competitive Effects from an Artificial Tear Solution to Protein Adsorption.
    Hall B; Jones LW; Forrest JA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Jul; 92(7):781-9. PubMed ID: 26002003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of wear and overwear on surface properties of etafilcon A contact lenses and adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Bruinsma GM; Rustema-Abbing M; de Vries J; Stegenga B; van der Mei HC; van der Linden ML; Hooymans JM; Busscher HJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Dec; 43(12):3646-53. PubMed ID: 12454031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protein-lipid interaction on the surface of a hydrophilic contact lens in vitro.
    Bontempo AR; Rapp J
    Curr Eye Res; 1997 Aug; 16(8):776-81. PubMed ID: 9255506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials using an in vitro model.
    Suwala M; Glasier MA; Subbaraman LN; Jones L
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 May; 33(3):138-43. PubMed ID: 17502748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship between contact lens surface charge and in-vitro protein deposition levels.
    Soltys-Robitaille CE; Ammon DM; Valint PL; Grobe GL
    Biomaterials; 2001 Dec; 22(24):3257-60. PubMed ID: 11700797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of lysosomal deposition on the friction coefficient of hydrogel contact lenses.
    Su CY; Yeh LK; Lai CC; Li KY; Tseng CL; Fang HW
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Apr; 43(2):144-148. PubMed ID: 31623924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of proteins on water and transport properties of various hydrogel contact lens materials.
    Mirejovsky D; Patel AS; Rodriguez DD
    Curr Eye Res; 1991 Mar; 10(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 2044386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conformational and quantitative characterization of lysozyme extracted from galyfilcon and senofilcon silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Glasier MA; Keech A; Sheardown H; Subbaraman LN; Jones L
    Curr Eye Res; 2008 Jan; 33(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 18214737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protein deposition on a lathe-cut silicone hydrogel contact lens material.
    Subbaraman LN; Woods J; Teichroeb JH; Jones L
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 19252421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.