127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11507696)
1. Estimating the percentage of Papanicolaou smears that can be reproducibly identified: modeling Papanicolaou smear interpretation based on multiple blinded rescreenings.
Renshaw AA
Cancer; 2001 Aug; 93(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 11507696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitivity studies of AutoPap System Location-Guided Screening of cervical-vaginal cytologic smears.
Huang TW; Lin TS; Lee JS
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 10349363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A practical guide to Papanicolaou smear rescreens: how many slides must be reevaluated to make a statistically valid assessment of screening performance?
Krieger PA; Cohen T; Naryshkin S
Cancer; 1998 Jun; 84(3):130-7. PubMed ID: 9678725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid prescreening of Papanicolaou smears: a practical and efficient quality control strategy.
Djemli A; Khetani K; Auger M
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 108(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 16302251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A more accurate measure of the false-negative rate of Papanicolaou smear screening is obtained by determining the false-negative rate of the rescreening process.
Renshaw AA; DiNisco SA; Minter LJ; Cibas ES
Cancer; 1997 Oct; 81(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 9349513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single-slide Pap smear: an acceptable alternative to the double-slide Pap smear.
Quackenbush SR
Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 May; 20(5):317-20. PubMed ID: 10319236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A practical problem with calculating the false-negative rate of Papanicolaou smear interpretation by rescreening negative cases alone.
Renshaw AA
Cancer; 1999 Dec; 87(6):351-3. PubMed ID: 10603188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Blinded review of Papanicolaou smears in the context of litigation.
Renshaw AA; Young ML; Holladay EB
Cancer; 2004 Jun; 102(3):136-41. PubMed ID: 15211471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Liquid-based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study.
Monsonego J; Autillo-Touati A; Bergeron C; Dachez R; Liaras J; Saurel J; Zerat L; Chatelain P; Mottot C
Br J Cancer; 2001 Feb; 84(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 11161401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Update on the Papanicolaou smear: new issues for the 1990s.
Ollayos CW
Mil Med; 1997 Aug; 162(8):521-3. PubMed ID: 9271901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effective reduction in inadequate Pap smears by using a saline-lubricated speculum and two glass slides.
Chen CJ; Hong MK; Ding DC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 59(6):906-909. PubMed ID: 33218410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The evaluation of cervical cancer screening by combining speculoscopy with Papanicolaou smear examination in Taiwan.
Chang JI; Ou CH; Wu KM; Chen CC; Cheng KC
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2002 Sep; 65(9):430-4. PubMed ID: 12433029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pap smears with glandular cell abnormalities: Are they detected by rapid prescreening?
Kanber Y; Charbonneau M; Auger M
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Dec; 123(12):739-44. PubMed ID: 26348845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The burden of prevention: downstream consequences of Pap smear testing in the elderly.
Sirovich BE; Gottlieb DJ; Fisher ES
J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):189-95. PubMed ID: 14738656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ThinPrep Pap Test. Accuracy for glandular disease.
Ashfaq R; Gibbons D; Vela C; Saboorian MH; Iliya F
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 9987455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endometrial cells and the AutoPap System for primary screening of cervicovaginal Pap smears.
Walts AE; Thomas P
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Oct; 27(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 12357502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rapid rescreen: a viable alternative to 1:10?
Dudding N
Diagn Cytopathol; 2001 Mar; 24(3):219-21. PubMed ID: 11241909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of modified rapid economic acetic acid-based Papanicolaou stain.
Bhagat P; Susheilia S; Singh K; Sadhukhan S; Rajwanshi A; Dey P
Cytopathology; 2016 Dec; 27(6):452-455. PubMed ID: 27019215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review.
Nanda K; McCrory DC; Myers ER; Bastian LA; Hasselblad V; Hickey JD; Matchar DB
Ann Intern Med; 2000 May; 132(10):810-9. PubMed ID: 10819705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The optimal technique for obtaining a Papanicolaou smear with the Cervex-Brush.
Ferris DG; Berrey MM; Ellis KE; Petry LJ; Voxnaes J; Beatie RT
J Fam Pract; 1992 Mar; 34(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 1541953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
