These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11507807)
1. Three-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays. Manhart J; Chen HY; Neuerer P; Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A; Hickel R Am J Dent; 2001 Apr; 14(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 11507807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A 2-year clinical study of composite and ceramic inlays. Manhart J; Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A; Chen HY; Hickel R Clin Oral Investig; 2000 Dec; 4(4):192-8. PubMed ID: 11218488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. Manhart J; Neuerer P; Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A; Hickel R J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11005901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical study of indirect composite resin inlays in posterior stress-bearing cavities placed by dental students: results after 4 years. Huth KC; Chen HY; Mehl A; Hickel R; Manhart J J Dent; 2011 Jul; 39(7):478-88. PubMed ID: 21554920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. One-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays in posterior teeth. Scheibenbogen A; Manhart J; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 9791786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: two-year clinical follow up. Coelho Santos MJ; Mondelli RF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 15088722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite. Sjögren G; Molin M; van Dijken JW Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 15119879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. Molin MK; Karlsson SL Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 11203631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. Dejak B; Mlotkowski A J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays. Frankenberger R; Reinelt C; Petschelt A; Krämer N Dent Mater; 2009 Aug; 25(8):960-8. PubMed ID: 19344946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Four-year clinical performance and marginal analysis of pressed glass ceramic inlays luted with ormocer restorative vs. conventional luting composite. Krämer N; Reinelt C; Richter G; Frankenberger R J Dent; 2009 Nov; 37(11):813-9. PubMed ID: 19744761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces. Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior. Frankenberger R; Petschelt A; Krämer N Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 11203857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Eight-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays. Hayashi M; Tsuchitani Y; Kawamura Y; Miura M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 11203859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of indirect resin composite and ceramic onlays over a 24-month period. Kaytan B; Onal B; Pamir T; Tezel H Gen Dent; 2005; 53(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 16252535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging. Manhart J; Schmidt M; Chen HY; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):357-66. PubMed ID: 11504435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]