These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11508013)

  • 1. Height, societal threat, and the victory margin in presidential elections (1824-1992).
    McCann SJ
    Psychol Rep; 2001 Jun; 88(3 Pt 1):741-2. PubMed ID: 11508013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simple method for predicting American presidential greatness from victory margin in popular vote (1824-1996).
    McCann SJ
    J Soc Psychol; 2005 Jun; 145(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 15960001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Political conservatism, authoritarianism, and societal threat: voting for Republican representatives in U.S. Congressional elections from 1946 to 1992.
    McCann SJ
    J Psychol; 2009 Jul; 143(4):341-58. PubMed ID: 19606642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Body height, social dominance and the political climate - a comment.
    Liu YC; Groth D
    Anthropol Anz; 2018 Jun; 74(5):445-450. PubMed ID: 29892773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stressful politics: voters' cortisol responses to the outcome of the 2008 United States Presidential election.
    Stanton SJ; Labar KS; Saini EK; Kuhn CM; Beehner JC
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2010 Jun; 35(5):768-74. PubMed ID: 19962831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mortality Salience, System Justification, and Candidate Evaluations in the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Sterling J; Jost JT; Shrout PE
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150556. PubMed ID: 26982197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes.
    Todorov A; Mandisodza AN; Goren A; Hall CC
    Science; 2005 Jun; 308(5728):1623-6. PubMed ID: 15947187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do heads of government age more quickly? Observational study comparing mortality between elected leaders and runners-up in national elections of 17 countries.
    Olenski AR; Abola MV; Jena AB
    BMJ; 2015 Dec; 351():h6424. PubMed ID: 26666894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Facial cues to perceived height influence leadership choices in simulated war and peace contexts.
    Re DE; DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Perrett DI
    Evol Psychol; 2013 Jan; 11(1):89-103. PubMed ID: 23372088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors associated with post-election psychological distress: The case of the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Pitcho-Prelorentzos S; Kaniasty K; Hamama-Raz Y; Goodwin R; Ring L; Ben-Ezra M; Mahat-Shamir M
    Psychiatry Res; 2018 Aug; 266():1-4. PubMed ID: 29787806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fearless dominance and the U.S. presidency: implications of psychopathic personality traits for successful and unsuccessful political leadership.
    Lilienfeld SO; Waldman ID; Landfield K; Watts AL; Rubenzer S; Faschingbauer TR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Sep; 103(3):489-505. PubMed ID: 22823288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Size, skills, and suffrage: Motivated distortions in perceived formidability of political leaders.
    Knapen JEP; Blaker NM; Pollet TV
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0188485. PubMed ID: 29267275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Competence Judgments Based on Facial Appearance Are Better Predictors of American Elections Than of Korean Elections.
    Na J; Kim S; Oh H; Choi I; O'Toole A
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Jul; 26(7):1107-13. PubMed ID: 25956912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Social Security: a financial appraisal for the median voter.
    Galasso V
    Soc Secur Bull; 2001-2002; 64(2):57-65. PubMed ID: 12428510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dominance, politics, and physiology: voters' testosterone changes on the night of the 2008 United States presidential election.
    Stanton SJ; Beehner JC; Saini EK; Kuhn CM; Labar KS
    PLoS One; 2009 Oct; 4(10):e7543. PubMed ID: 19844583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Politicization during the 2012 U.S. Presidential Elections: bridging the personal and the political through an identity content approach.
    Turner-Zwinkels F; van Zomeren M; Postmes T
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Mar; 41(3):433-45. PubMed ID: 25630374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heights of U.S. Presidents: a trend analysis for 1948-1996.
    Young TJ; French LA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Aug; 87(1):321-2. PubMed ID: 9760665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How an election loss leads to a social movement: Reactions to the 2016 U.S. presidential election among liberals predict later collective action and social movement identification.
    Bilali R; Godfrey EB; Freel SH
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2020 Jan; 59(1):227-247. PubMed ID: 31894871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote.
    Mutz DC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(19):E4330-E4339. PubMed ID: 29686081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wishful thinking in the 2008 U.S. presidential election.
    Krizan Z; Miller JC; Johar O
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jan; 21(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 20424035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.