177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11508106)
1. A new carbide finishing bur for bracket debonding.
Radlanski RJ
J Orofac Orthop; 2001 Jul; 62(4):296-304. PubMed ID: 11508106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro evaluation of enamel surface roughness and morphology after orthodontic debonding: Traditional cleanup systems versus polymer bur.
Soares Tenório KC; Neupmann Feres MF; Tanaka CJ; Augusto MKM; Rodrigues JA; Pereira da Silva HD; Arana-Chavez VE; Roscoe MG
Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):546-554. PubMed ID: 32493624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enamel surface morphology after bracket debonding.
Osorio R; Toledano M; García-Godoy F
ASDC J Dent Child; 1998; 65(5):313-7, 354. PubMed ID: 9795734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods.
Vidor MM; Felix RP; Marchioro EM; Hahn L
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 25992989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of enamel roughness after orthodontic debonding and clean-up procedures using zirconia, tungsten carbide, and white stone burs: an in vitro study.
Thawaba AA; Albelasy NF; Elsherbini AM; Hafez AM
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):478. PubMed ID: 37443027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding: A Comparative Study using Three Different Burs.
Garg R; Dixit P; Khosla T; Gupta P; Kalra H; Kumar P
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):521-526. PubMed ID: 29807961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enamel surface roughness of preferred debonding and polishing protocols.
Webb BJ; Koch J; Hagan JL; Ballard RW; Armbruster PC
J Orthod; 2016 Mar; 43(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 26282121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In-vivo evaluation of the surface roughness and morphology of enamel after bracket removal and polishing by different techniques.
Faria-Júnior ÉM; Guiraldo RD; Berger SB; Correr AB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Contreras EF; Lopes MB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 25726399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: an in vitro qualitative study.
Zarrinnia K; Eid NM; Kehoe MJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):284-93. PubMed ID: 7661146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of enamel surface roughness after orthodontic bracket debonding with atomic force microscopy.
Mohebi S; Shafiee HA; Ameli N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):521-527. PubMed ID: 28257737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of various debonding and adhesive clearance methods on enamel surface: an in vitro study.
Fan XC; Chen L; Huang XF
BMC Oral Health; 2017 Feb; 17(1):58. PubMed ID: 28241812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding.
Ulusoy C
J Appl Oral Sci; 2009; 17(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19466253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of different resin removal methods on enamel after metal and ceramic bracket debonding : An in vitro micro-computed tomography study.
Cesur E; Arslan C; Orhan AI; Bilecenoğlu B; Orhan K
J Orofac Orthop; 2022 May; 83(3):157-171. PubMed ID: 34165586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enamel Quality after Debonding: Evaluation by Optical Coherence Tomography.
Leão Filho JC; Braz AK; de Araujo RE; Tanaka OM; Pithon MM
Braz Dent J; 2015; 26(4):384-9. PubMed ID: 26312977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of debonding of orthodontic brackets on topography and surface roughness of composite restorations.
Moradi M; Hormozi E; Shamohammadi M; Rakhshan V
Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):623-637. PubMed ID: 30343063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bonding and debonding characteristics of APC-plus clarity brackets compared to APC clarity brackets.
Staribratova-Reister K; Jost-Brinkmann PG
World J Orthod; 2004; 5(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 15633377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding.
Cardoso LA; Valdrighi HC; Vedovello Filho M; Correr AB
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):105-12. PubMed ID: 25628087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enamel surfaces after orthodontic bracket debonding.
Campbell PM
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 7785800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enamel loss and adhesive remnants following bracket removal and various clean-up procedures in vitro.
Ryf S; Flury S; Palaniappan S; Lussi A; van Meerbeek B; Zimmerli B
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 21228118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements.
Krell KV; Courey JM; Bishara SE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 8456784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
