These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11508106)

  • 1. A new carbide finishing bur for bracket debonding.
    Radlanski RJ
    J Orofac Orthop; 2001 Jul; 62(4):296-304. PubMed ID: 11508106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro evaluation of enamel surface roughness and morphology after orthodontic debonding: Traditional cleanup systems versus polymer bur.
    Soares Tenório KC; Neupmann Feres MF; Tanaka CJ; Augusto MKM; Rodrigues JA; Pereira da Silva HD; Arana-Chavez VE; Roscoe MG
    Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):546-554. PubMed ID: 32493624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enamel surface morphology after bracket debonding.
    Osorio R; Toledano M; García-Godoy F
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1998; 65(5):313-7, 354. PubMed ID: 9795734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods.
    Vidor MM; Felix RP; Marchioro EM; Hahn L
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 25992989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of enamel roughness after orthodontic debonding and clean-up procedures using zirconia, tungsten carbide, and white stone burs: an in vitro study.
    Thawaba AA; Albelasy NF; Elsherbini AM; Hafez AM
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):478. PubMed ID: 37443027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding: A Comparative Study using Three Different Burs.
    Garg R; Dixit P; Khosla T; Gupta P; Kalra H; Kumar P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):521-526. PubMed ID: 29807961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enamel surface roughness of preferred debonding and polishing protocols.
    Webb BJ; Koch J; Hagan JL; Ballard RW; Armbruster PC
    J Orthod; 2016 Mar; 43(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 26282121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In-vivo evaluation of the surface roughness and morphology of enamel after bracket removal and polishing by different techniques.
    Faria-Júnior ÉM; Guiraldo RD; Berger SB; Correr AB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Contreras EF; Lopes MB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 25726399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: an in vitro qualitative study.
    Zarrinnia K; Eid NM; Kehoe MJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):284-93. PubMed ID: 7661146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of enamel surface roughness after orthodontic bracket debonding with atomic force microscopy.
    Mohebi S; Shafiee HA; Ameli N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):521-527. PubMed ID: 28257737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of various debonding and adhesive clearance methods on enamel surface: an in vitro study.
    Fan XC; Chen L; Huang XF
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Feb; 17(1):58. PubMed ID: 28241812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding.
    Ulusoy C
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2009; 17(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19466253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of different resin removal methods on enamel after metal and ceramic bracket debonding : An in vitro micro-computed tomography study.
    Cesur E; Arslan C; Orhan AI; Bilecenoğlu B; Orhan K
    J Orofac Orthop; 2022 May; 83(3):157-171. PubMed ID: 34165586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enamel Quality after Debonding: Evaluation by Optical Coherence Tomography.
    Leão Filho JC; Braz AK; de Araujo RE; Tanaka OM; Pithon MM
    Braz Dent J; 2015; 26(4):384-9. PubMed ID: 26312977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of debonding of orthodontic brackets on topography and surface roughness of composite restorations.
    Moradi M; Hormozi E; Shamohammadi M; Rakhshan V
    Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):623-637. PubMed ID: 30343063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bonding and debonding characteristics of APC-plus clarity brackets compared to APC clarity brackets.
    Staribratova-Reister K; Jost-Brinkmann PG
    World J Orthod; 2004; 5(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 15633377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding.
    Cardoso LA; Valdrighi HC; Vedovello Filho M; Correr AB
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):105-12. PubMed ID: 25628087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enamel surfaces after orthodontic bracket debonding.
    Campbell PM
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 7785800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enamel loss and adhesive remnants following bracket removal and various clean-up procedures in vitro.
    Ryf S; Flury S; Palaniappan S; Lussi A; van Meerbeek B; Zimmerli B
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 21228118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements.
    Krell KV; Courey JM; Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 8456784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.