These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11508406)

  • 21. KWAZO, a new instrument to assess the quality of service delivery in assistive technology provision.
    Dijcks BP; Wessels RD; de Vlieger SL; Post MW
    Disabil Rehabil; 2006 Aug; 28(15):909-14. PubMed ID: 16861198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Development and evaluation of an instrument to measure parental satisfaction with quality of care in neonatal follow-up.
    Butt ML; Pinelli J; Boyle MH; Thomas H; Hunsberger M; Saigal S; Lee DS; Fanning JK; Austin P
    J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2009 Feb; 30(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 19194325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Measuring quality and performance of assistive technology: results of a prospective monitoring program.
    Kohn JG; LeBlanc M; Mortola P
    Assist Technol; 1994; 6(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 10150738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cost analyses in assistive technology research.
    Harris F; Sprigle S
    Assist Technol; 2003; 15(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 14760978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Usability of a navigation application for travel in Quebec City with wheeled mobility device and, further validation of the Evaluation of satisfaction with geospatial assistive technology.
    Vincent C; Levac S; Dumont F; Archambault PS; Routhier F; Mostafavi MA
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Feb; 19(2):367-382. PubMed ID: 35730247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Test-retest reliability of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology 2.0-Korean version for individuals with spinal cord injury.
    Hwang WJ; Hwang S; Chung Y
    J Phys Ther Sci; 2015 May; 27(5):1291-3. PubMed ID: 26157203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Field testing of two electronic mobility aid devices for persons who are deaf-blind.
    Vincent C; Routhier F; Martel V; Mottard MÈ; Dumont F; Côté L; Cloutier D
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Sep; 9(5):414-20. PubMed ID: 24266810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement: personal care and instrumental activities domain.
    Coster WJ; Haley SM; Andres PL; Ludlow LH; Bond TL; Ni PS
    Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1 Suppl):I62-72. PubMed ID: 14707756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development and standardization of an assistive technology questionnaire using factor analyses: eight factors consisting of 67 items related to assistive technology practices.
    Seok S; Dacosta B
    Assist Technol; 2014; 26(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 24800449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predicting satisfaction with assistive technology for a sample of adults with new spinal cord injuries.
    Scherer MJ; Cushman LA
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Dec; 87(3 Pt 1):981-7. PubMed ID: 11191417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Consequential validity of an assistive technology supplement for the School Function Assessment.
    Silverman MK; Smith RO
    Assist Technol; 2006; 18(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 17236474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computer-related assistive technology: satisfaction and experiences among users with disabilities.
    Burton M; Nieuwenhuijsen ER; Epstein MJ
    Assist Technol; 2008; 20(2):99-106; quiz 84-5. PubMed ID: 18646432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Satisfaction with care among patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: development and first steps of validation of the REPERES-60 questionnaire.
    Defossez G; Mathoulin-Pelissier S; Ingrand I; Gasquet I; Sifer-Riviere L; Ingrand P; Salamon R; Migeot V;
    BMC Cancer; 2007 Jul; 7():129. PubMed ID: 17634110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Implementing a routine outcome assessment procedure to evaluate the quality of assistive technology service delivery for children with physical or multiple disabilities: Perceived effectiveness, social cost, and user satisfaction.
    Desideri L; Bizzarri M; Bitelli C; Roentgen U; Gelderblom GJ; de Witte L
    Assist Technol; 2016; 28(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 26479329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Test-retest reliability and agreement of the Satisfaction with the Assistive Technology Services (SATS) instrument in two Nordic countries.
    Sund T; Iwarsson S; Anttila H; Helle T; Brandt A
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2014 Jul; 30(5):367-74. PubMed ID: 24410414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Construct validity of the Chinese version of the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation Questionnaire (PRWE-Hong Kong Version).
    Wah JW; Wang MK; Ping CL
    J Hand Ther; 2006; 19(1):18-26, quiz 27. PubMed ID: 16473730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Scale to measure patient satisfaction with physical therapy.
    Monnin D; Perneger TV
    Phys Ther; 2002 Jul; 82(7):682-91. PubMed ID: 12088465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development of a psychometric scale to assess satisfaction with dental care among Sri Lankans.
    Perera IR; Usgodaarachchi US
    Community Dent Health; 2009 Sep; 26(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 19780355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Psychometric and administrative properties of measures used in assistive technology device outcomes research.
    Lenker JA; Scherer MJ; Fuhrer MJ; Jutai JW; DeRuyter F
    Assist Technol; 2005; 17(1):7-22. PubMed ID: 16121642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development and preliminary evaluation of the caregiver assistive technology outcome measure.
    Mortenson WB; Demers L; Fuhrer MJ; Jutai JW; Lenker J; DeRuyter F
    J Rehabil Med; 2015 May; 47(5):412-8. PubMed ID: 25783142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.