These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1150952)

  • 1. Suppressive and enhancing effects of footshock on food-reinforced operant responding following septal lesions in rats.
    Dickinson A
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1975 Feb; 88(2):851-61. PubMed ID: 1150952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response-contingent stimuli and DRL performance after septal lesions in rats.
    Hobbs SH; Bunnell BN; Henke PG
    Brain Res Bull; 1976; 1(5):453-8. PubMed ID: 1009446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DRL performance, extinction, and secondary reinforcement: role of appetitive value of food in mice with septal lesions.
    Carlson NR; El-Wakil FW; Standish LJ; Ormond DL
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1976 Aug; 90(8):780-9. PubMed ID: 965526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Septal ablation in the rat and bar pressing under appetitive and aversive control.
    Koppell S; Sodetz FJ
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1972 Nov; 81(2):274-80. PubMed ID: 5084444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhanced response acceleration or suppression produced by response-independent food presentations in rats with septal lesions.
    DeNoble V; Caplan M
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1977 Feb; 91(1):107-19. PubMed ID: 838909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Punishment-induced suppression and the occurrence of behavioral contrast in rats with septal lesions.
    Caplan M; Graefe J
    Behav Neural Biol; 1980 Nov; 30(3):278-91. PubMed ID: 7469966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response suppression in rats: a comparison of response-contingent and noncontingent punishment and the effect of the minor tranquilizer, chlordiazepoxide.
    Huppert FA; Iversen SD
    Psychopharmacologia; 1975 Oct; 44(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 1197581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Renewal after the punishment of free operant behavior.
    Bouton ME; Schepers ST
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 25706548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Slower acquisition of positively reinforced behavior following medial, but not dorsolateral, septal lesions in rats.
    Sagvolden T; Holth P
    Behav Neurosci; 1986 Jun; 100(3):330-6. PubMed ID: 3730138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Persistence of runway performance after septal lesions in rats.
    Henke PG
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1974 May; 86(5):760-67. PubMed ID: 4833582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response suppression in normal and septal rats.
    Atnip G; Hothersall D
    Physiol Behav; 1975 Oct; 15(5):417-21. PubMed ID: 1221449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Punishment of an extinguishing shock-avoidance response by time-out from positive reinforcement.
    Nigro MR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1966 Jan; 9(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 5903964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors underlying deficient passive-avoidance behavior by rats with septal lesions.
    Beatty WW; Beatty PA; O'Briant DA; Gregoire KC; Dahl BL
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1973 Dec; 85(3):502-14. PubMed ID: 4586876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of septal lesions on the discrimination of fixed-ratio performance.
    Cohen SL; Poplawsky A
    Physiol Behav; 1982 Aug; 29(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 7146126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-administered and noncontingent nicotine enhance reinforced operant responding in rats: impact of nicotine dose and reinforcement schedule.
    Chaudhri N; Caggiula AR; Donny EC; Booth S; Gharib M; Craven L; Palmatier MI; Liu X; Sved AF
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2007 Feb; 190(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 16847680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Suppressive effects of punishment of operant responding in rats with septal lesions.
    Sodetz FJ; Koppell S
    Physiol Behav; 1972 May; 8(5):837-40. PubMed ID: 5046237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of neonatal septal lesions on DRL performance in adulthood.
    Stahl JM; Ellen P
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1977 Feb; 91(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 838919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response suppression on DRL by rats with septal damage.
    Ellen P; Mokohon L; Richardson WK
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1978 Jun; 92(3):511-21. PubMed ID: 681566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reinforcement omission, non-contingent reinforcement, and limbic lesions in rats.
    Manning FJ; McDonough JH
    Behav Biol; 1974 Jul; 11(3):327-38. PubMed ID: 4607005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Suppression of operant behavior and schedule-induced licking in rats.
    Bond NW; Blackman DE; Scruton P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Nov; 20(3):375-83. PubMed ID: 4759059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.