168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11511885)
1. Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography: usefulness of morphological criteria.
Wedegärtner U; Bick U; Wörtler K; Rummeny E; Bongartz G
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1645-50. PubMed ID: 11511885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benign and malignant breast lesions: diagnosis with multiparametric MR imaging.
Jacobs MA; Barker PB; Bluemke DA; Maranto C; Arnold C; Herskovits EH; Bhujwalla Z
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):225-32. PubMed ID: 14519877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast MR imaging with commercially available techniques: radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Fobben ES; Rubin CZ; Kalisher L; Dembner AG; Seltzer MH; Santoro EJ
Radiology; 1995 Jul; 196(1):143-52. PubMed ID: 7784558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-phase dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging with two-way subtraction.
Choi N; Han BK; Choe YH; Kim HS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2005; 29(6):834-41. PubMed ID: 16272861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fast 3D Near-infrared breast imaging using indocyanine green for detection and characterization of breast lesions.
Schneider P; Piper S; Schmitz CH; Schreiter NF; Volkwein N; Lüdemann L; Malzahn U; Poellinger A
Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):956-63. PubMed ID: 21972043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic MR mammography: a technique for potentially reducing the biopsy rate for benign breast disease.
Turkat TJ; Klein BD; Polan RL; Richman RH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(4):563-8. PubMed ID: 7949682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of clinical breast MR imaging performed with prototype computer-aided diagnosis breast MR imaging workstation: reader study.
Shimauchi A; Giger ML; Bhooshan N; Lan L; Pesce LL; Lee JK; Abe H; Newstead GM
Radiology; 2011 Mar; 258(3):696-704. PubMed ID: 21212365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions by mechanical imaging.
Egorov V; Kearney T; Pollak SB; Rohatgi C; Sarvazyan N; Airapetian S; Browning S; Sarvazyan A
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Nov; 118(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 19306059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discrimination between benign and malignant breast lesions using volumetric quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Cheng Z; Wu Z; Shi G; Yi Z; Xie M; Zeng W; Song C; Zheng C; Shen J
Eur Radiol; 2018 Mar; 28(3):982-991. PubMed ID: 28929243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic performance of quantitative diffusion tensor imaging for the differentiation of breast lesions at 3 T MRI.
Tsougos I; Bakosis M; Tsivaka D; Athanassiou E; Fezoulidis I; Arvanitis D; Vassiou K
Clin Imaging; 2019; 53():25-31. PubMed ID: 30308430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast.
Gökalp G; Topal U
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 16316732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic 3D-MR mammography: is there a benefit of sophisticated evaluation of enhancement curves for clinical routine?
Müller-Schimpfle M; Ohmenhäuser K; Sand J; Stoll P; Claussen CD
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 7(1):236-40. PubMed ID: 9039622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging.
Kvistad KA; Rydland J; Vainio J; Smethurst HB; Lundgren S; Fjøsne HE; Haraldseth O
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 10924584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of breast cancer with conventional mammography and contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Kacl GM; Liu P; Debatin JF; Garzoli E; Caduff RF; Krestin GP
Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 9477265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adding in vivo quantitative 1H MR spectroscopy to improve diagnostic accuracy of breast MR imaging: preliminary results of observer performance study at 4.0 T.
Meisamy S; Bolan PJ; Baker EH; Pollema MG; Le CT; Kelcz F; Lechner MC; Luikens BA; Carlson RA; Brandt KR; Amrami KK; Nelson MT; Everson LI; Emory TH; Tuttle TM; Yee D; Garwood M
Radiology; 2005 Aug; 236(2):465-75. PubMed ID: 16040903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
Min Q; Shao K; Zhai L; Liu W; Zhu C; Yuan L; Yang J
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 13():32. PubMed ID: 25889380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI.
Chen W; Giger ML; Bick U; Newstead GM
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2878-87. PubMed ID: 16964864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features.
Goto M; Ito H; Akazawa K; Kubota T; Kizu O; Yamada K; Nishimura T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 17152054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic performance of ADC for Non-mass-like breast lesions on MR imaging.
Imamura T; Isomoto I; Sueyoshi E; Yano H; Uga T; Abe K; Hayashi T; Honda S; Yamaguchi T; Uetani M
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2010; 9(4):217-25. PubMed ID: 21187691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Critical role of spatial resolution in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI.
Furman-Haran E; Grobgeld D; Kelcz F; Degani H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Jun; 13(6):862-7. PubMed ID: 11382945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
