160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11511892)
1. Image quality vs. radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study.
Geijer H; Beckman KW; Andersson T; Persliden J
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1704-9. PubMed ID: 11511892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography: contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses.
Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger Z; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):212-20. PubMed ID: 12649645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of digital imaging on radiation doses to the patient during X-ray examination of the urinary tract.
Sjöholm B; Geijer H; Persliden J
Acta Radiol; 2005 Oct; 46(6):657-61. PubMed ID: 16334851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H
Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiation dose reduction in chest radiography using a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector.
Hosch WP; Fink C; Radeleff B; kampschulte a A; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
Clin Radiol; 2002 Oct; 57(10):902-7. PubMed ID: 12413914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of a flat-panel detector in the detection of artificial erosive changes: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography.
Ludwig K; Henschel A; Bernhardt TM; Lenzen H; Wormanns D; Diederich S; Heindel W
Eur Radiol; 2003 Jun; 13(6):1316-23. PubMed ID: 12764648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
Busch HP; Busch S; Decker C; Schilz C
Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon versus asymmetric screen-film system: phantom study of dose reduction and depiction of simulated findings.
Rapp-Bernhardt U; Roehl FW; Gibbs RC; Schmidl H; Krause UW; Bernhardt TM
Radiology; 2003 May; 227(2):484-92. PubMed ID: 12676965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model.
Ludwig K; Ahlers K; Wormanns D; Freund M; Bernhardt TM; Diederich S; Heindel W
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 12925714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Vereecken L; De Hauwere A; Duyck P; De Man R; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):630-7. PubMed ID: 16928923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital radiography with a large-area, amorphous-silicon, flat-panel X-ray detector system.
Spahn M; Strotzer M; Völk M; Böhm S; Geiger B; Hahm G; Feuerbach S
Invest Radiol; 2000 Apr; 35(4):260-6. PubMed ID: 10764095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flat panel digital radiography compared with storage phosphor computed radiography: assessment of dose versus image quality in phantom studies.
Fischbach F; Ricke J; Freund T; Werk M; Spors B; Baumann C; Pech MJ; Felix R
Invest Radiol; 2002 Nov; 37(11):609-14. PubMed ID: 12393973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of low-contrast detail perception on storage phosphor radiographs and digital flat panel detector images.
Peer S; Neitzel U; Giacomuzzi SM; Peer R; Gassner E; Steingruber I; Jaschke W
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Mar; 20(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 11341713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simulated bone erosions in a hand phantom: detection with conventional screen-film technology versus cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
Strotzer M; Völk M; Wild T; von Landenberg P; Feuerbach S
Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):512-5. PubMed ID: 10796933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reducing the radiation dose during excretory urography: flat-panel silicon x-ray detector versus computed radiography.
Zähringer M; Hesselmann V; Schulte O; Kamm KF; Braun W; Haupt G; Krug B; Lackner K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):931-7. PubMed ID: 14500204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of simulated chest lesions with normal and reduced radiation dose: comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon.
Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser JK; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Feuerbach S
Invest Radiol; 1998 Feb; 33(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 9493725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A real-time flat-panel X-ray pixel imaging system for low-dose medical diagnostics and craniofacial applications.
Chapuy S; Dimcovski D; Dimcovski Z; Grigoriev E; Grob E; Ligier Y; Pachoud M; Riondel F; Rüfenacht D; Sayegh C; Terrier F; Valley JF; Verdun FR
J Craniofac Surg; 2000 Jan; 11(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 11314093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flat-panel x-ray detector using amorphous silicon technology. Reduced radiation dose for the detection of foreign bodies.
Völk M; Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Alexander J; Fründ R; Seitz J; Manke C; Spahn M; Feuerbach S
Invest Radiol; 1997 Jul; 32(7):373-7. PubMed ID: 9228601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental evaluation of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for the pediatric chest: comparison with storage phosphor radiography at different exposures by using a chest phantom.
Rapp-Bernhardt U; Bernhardt TM; Lenzen H; Esseling R; Roehl FW; Schiborr M; Theobald-Hormann I; Heindel W
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 16170012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
