119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11511893)
21. A search for improved technique factors in paediatric fluoroscopy.
Tapiovaara MJ; Sandborg M; Dance DR
Phys Med Biol; 1999 Feb; 44(2):537-59. PubMed ID: 10070800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pushing the limits: establishing an ultra-low framerate and antiscatter grid-less radiation protocol for left atrial ablations.
Attanasio P; Schreiber T; Pieske B; Blaschke F; Boldt LH; Haverkamp W; Huemer M
Europace; 2018 Apr; 20(4):604-607. PubMed ID: 28339980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Investigation of the performance of antiscatter grids: Monte Carlo simulation studies.
Chan HP; Doi K
Phys Med Biol; 1982 Jun; 27(6):785-803. PubMed ID: 7111390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Improvement of image quality at low-radiation dose and low-contrast material dose abdominal CT in patients with cirrhosis: intraindividual comparison of low tube voltage with iterative reconstruction algorithm and standard tube voltage.
Namimoto T; Oda S; Utsunomiya D; Shimonobo T; Morita S; Nakaura T; Yamashita Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 22805682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluating the use of anti-scatter grids in adult knee radiography.
Abela N; Guilherme Couto J; Zarb F; Mizzi D
Radiography (Lond); 2022 Aug; 28(3):663-667. PubMed ID: 35623269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Automated tube voltage selection in thoracoabdominal computed tomography at high pitch using a third-generation dual-source scanner: image quality and radiation dose performance.
Lurz M; Lell MM; Wuest W; Eller A; Scharf M; Uder M; May MS
Invest Radiol; 2015 May; 50(5):352-60. PubMed ID: 25591129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of image quality and mean absorbed dose to the breast for two mammographic films.
Persliden J; Fransson V; Vitak B; Fagerberg G
Acta Radiol; 1993 Jul; 34(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 8318296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Scatter radiation in cephalometric radiography: the effects of grid and collimation.
Tsuji Y; Araki K; Endo A; Okano T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):278-82. PubMed ID: 16798926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of pediatric radiation dose and vessel visibility on angiographic systems using piglets as a surrogate: antiscatter grid removal vs. lower detector air kerma settings with a grid - a preclinical investigation.
Strauss KJ; Racadio JM; Abruzzo TA; Johnson ND; Patel MN; Kukreja KU; den Hartog MJ; Hoonaert BP; Nachabe RA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):408-417. PubMed ID: 26699297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model.
Ludwig K; Ahlers K; Wormanns D; Freund M; Bernhardt TM; Diederich S; Heindel W
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 12925714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A phantom approach to find the optimal technical parameters for plain chest radiography.
Vassileva J
Br J Radiol; 2004 Aug; 77(920):648-53. PubMed ID: 15326041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Image quality and dose comparison among screen-film, computed, and CT scanned projection radiography: applications to CT urography.
McCollough CH; Bruesewitz MR; Vrtiska TJ; King BF; LeRoy AJ; Quam JP; Hattery RR
Radiology; 2001 Nov; 221(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 11687682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Bedside thoracic radiography: a comparison between 3 different types of grid].
Ciccotosto C; Storto ML; Guidotti A; Ferrante R; Bonomo L
Radiol Med; 1994; 87(1-2):127-33. PubMed ID: 8128015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of the antiscatter grid on dose and image quality in pediatric interventional cardiology X-ray systems.
Ubeda C; Vano E; Gonzalez L; Miranda P
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 82(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 22899572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Dose reduction and image quality in MDCT of the upper abdomen: potential of an adaptive post-processing filter].
Kröpil P; Lanzman RS; Walther C; Röhlen S; Godehardt E; Mödder U; Cohnen M
Rofo; 2010 Mar; 182(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19899025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Ullman G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Increased radiation dose to overweight and obese patients from radiographic examinations.
Yanch JC; Behrman RH; Hendricks MJ; McCall JH
Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):128-39. PubMed ID: 19403846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The impact of increased Al filtration on x-ray tube loading and image quality in diagnostic radiology.
Behrman RH
Med Phys; 2003 Jan; 30(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 12557981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. EVALUATION OF DOSE REDUCTION POTENTIALS OF A NOVEL SCATTER CORRECTION SOFTWARE FOR BEDSIDE CHEST X-RAY IMAGING.
Renger B; Brieskorn C; Toth V; Mentrup D; Jockel S; Lohöfer F; Schwarz M; Rummeny EJ; Noël PB
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):60-7. PubMed ID: 26977074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Grid versus air gap. A comparison of cephalometric techniques.
Benson BW; Frederiksen NL; Goaz PW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jan; 77(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 8108105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
