These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11511893)

  • 61. Optimization of radiographic parameters for paediatric cardiac angiography.
    Onnasch DG; Schemm A; Kramer HH
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Jun; 77(918):479-87. PubMed ID: 15151968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Effects of automatic tube potential selection on radiation dose index, image quality, and lesion detectability in pediatric abdominopelvic CT and CTA: a phantom study.
    Brinkley MF; Ramirez-Giraldo JC; Samei E; Frush DJ; Choudhury KR; Wilson JM; Christianson OI; Frush DP
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 25991484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. [Usefulness of Post-processing Scatter Correction in Portable Abdominal Radiography Using a Low Ratio Anti-scatter Grid].
    Ichikawa H; Yamada Y; Sawane Y; Terabe M; Ono T; Nishikawa M; Yamaguchi M; Shimada H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2019; 75(9):885-891. PubMed ID: 31548465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Adult abdomen-pelvis CT: Does equilibrium dose-pitch product better account for the kVp dependence of organ dose than conventional CTDI?
    Li X; Morgan AG; Liptak CL; Muryn JS; Dong FF; Primak AN; Segars WP
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6258-68. PubMed ID: 26520718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Low-dose abdominal computed tomography for detection of urinary stone disease - Impact of additional spectral shaping of the X-ray beam on image quality and dose parameters.
    Dewes P; Frellesen C; Scholtz JE; Fischer S; Vogl TJ; Bauer RW; Schulz B
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1058-62. PubMed ID: 27161052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Clinical application of a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography.
    Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Manke C; Albrich H; Feuerbach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9648757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Monte Carlo study of grid performance in diagnostic radiology: task dependent optimization for screen-film imaging.
    Sandborg M; Dance DR; Carlsson GA; Persliden J
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Jan; 67(793):76-85. PubMed ID: 8298879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Clinical evaluation and potential radiation dose reduction of the novel sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction technique (SAFIRE) in abdominal computed tomography angiography.
    Schabel C; Fenchel M; Schmidt B; Flohr TG; Wuerslin C; Thomas C; Korn A; Tsiflikas I; Claussen CD; Heuschmid M; Ketelsen D
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Feb; 20(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 23099242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
    Lofthag-Hansen S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Single- and dual-energy CT of the abdomen: comparison of radiation dose and image quality of 2nd and 3rd generation dual-source CT.
    Wichmann JL; Hardie AD; Schoepf UJ; Felmly LM; Perry JD; Varga-Szemes A; Mangold S; Caruso D; Canstein C; Vogl TJ; De Cecco CN
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):642-650. PubMed ID: 27165140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. [Digital radiography of the thorax with selenium detector. Clinical results and optimization potential of the technique].
    Procacci C; Minniti S; Caumo F; Moore F; Ternullo S; Predicatori F; Locatelli F; Pistolesi GF
    Radiol Med; 1998 Nov; 96(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 10051867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Detection of urinary tract stones at low-radiation-dose CT with z-axis automatic tube current modulation: phantom and clinical studies.
    Kalra MK; Maher MM; D'Souza RV; Rizzo S; Halpern EF; Blake MA; Saini S
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):523-9. PubMed ID: 15770037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Successful Dose Reduction Using Reduced Tube Voltage With Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction in Pediatric Abdominal CT.
    Berlin SC; Weinert DM; Vasavada PS; Martinez-Rios C; Parikh RA; Wien MA; Jordan DW; Novak RD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):392-9. PubMed ID: 26204293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Grid removal and impact on population dose in full-field digital mammography.
    Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Klausz R; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 17388172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Feasibility study of a synchronized-moving-grid (SMOG) system to improve image quality in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
    Ren L; Yin FF; Chetty IJ; Jaffray DA; Jin JY
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5099-110. PubMed ID: 22894435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Optimisation of patient radiation protection in conventional X-ray imaging procedures using film reject analysis: a demonstration of the importance of rare earth screen-film systems.
    Inkoom S; Schandorf C; Fletcher JJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Sep; 136(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 19737839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
    Busch HP; Busch S; Decker C; Schilz C
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. [Radiation exposure in abdominal radiography with digital luminescence radiography and conventional screen-film system: an experimental animal study].
    Seifert H; Schneider G; Kubale R; Blass G; Kramann B; Leetz HK
    Rofo; 1996 Oct; 165(4):386-91. PubMed ID: 8963053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.