These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11512395)
21. [Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in the urologic study of the male pelvis. Apropos of 60 examinations]. Vavdin F; Guiter J; Averous M; Grasset D; Lestienne H; Fraga J; Rouanet JP; Lamarque JL J Urol (Paris); 1986; 92(8):509-20. PubMed ID: 3805746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer. Park BK; Kim B; Kim CK; Lee HM; Kwon GY J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(4):534-8. PubMed ID: 17882027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Characterization of localized seminal vesicle amyloidosis causing hemospermia: an analysis using immunohistochemistry and magnetic resonance imaging. Furuya S; Masumori N; Furuya R; Tsukamoto T; Isomura H; Tamakawa M J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1273-7. PubMed ID: 15758775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer. Huzjan R; Sala E; Hricak H Nat Clin Pract Urol; 2005 Sep; 2(9):434-42. PubMed ID: 16474681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The role of conventional and functional endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision of whether to preserve or resect the neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Labanaris AP; Zugor V; Takriti S; Smiszek R; Engelhard K; Nutzel R; Kuhn R Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2009; 43(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 18759166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Phased array magnetic resonance imaging for staging clinically localised prostrate cancer. Borre M; Lundorf E; Marcussen N; Langkilde NC; Wolf H Acta Oncol; 2005; 44(6):589-92. PubMed ID: 16294442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. 3-T MRI with phased-array coil in local staging of prostatic cancer. Torricelli P; Barberini A; Cinquantini F; Sighinolfi M; Cesinaro AM Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1118-25. PubMed ID: 18692752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Correlation of FDG-PET and MRI/CT with histopathology in primary diagnosis, lymph node staging and diagnosis of recurrency of head and neck cancer]. Pöpperl G; Lang S; Dagdelen O; Jäger L; Tiling R; Hahn K; Tatsch K Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):714-20. PubMed ID: 12063600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate with combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils; Initial experience(1). Bloch BN; Rofsky NM; Baroni RH; Marquis RP; Pedrosa I; Lenkinski RE Acad Radiol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):863-7. PubMed ID: 15288036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Local staging of rectal cancer using combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coil MRI. Tatli S; Mortele KJ; Breen EL; Bleday R; Silverman SG J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Apr; 23(4):534-40. PubMed ID: 16523466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of benign and malignant pelvic tumors]. Hauth EA; Stattaus J; Debatin JF; Ruehm SG Rofo; 2004 Jun; 176(6):817-28. PubMed ID: 15173974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Does body-coil magnetic-resonance imaging have a role in the preoperative staging of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer? Allen DJ; Hindley R; Clovis S; O'Donnell P; Cahill D; Rottenberg G; Popert R BJU Int; 2004 Sep; 94(4):534-8. PubMed ID: 15329107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. CT and MRI of the male genital tract: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Kubik-Huch RA; Hailemariam S; Hamm B Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 9933374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Fuchsjäger MH; Shukla-Dave A; Hricak H; Wang L; Touijer K; Donohue JF; Eastham JA; Kattan MW BJU Int; 2009 Aug; 104(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 19220263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer. Kim CK; Kim SH; Choi D; Kim MJ; Chun HK; Lee SJ; Lee JM J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):853-9. PubMed ID: 18043346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer. Yoshizako T; Wada A; Hayashi T; Uchida K; Sumura M; Uchida N; Kitagaki H; Igawa M Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1207-13. PubMed ID: 19031184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Magnetic resonance imaging of anal cancer. Roach SC; Hulse PA; Moulding FJ; Wilson R; Carrington BM Clin Radiol; 2005 Oct; 60(10):1111-9. PubMed ID: 16179172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Preoperative staging of rectal tumors: comparison of endorectal ultrasound, hydro-CT, and high-resolution endorectal MRI. Dinter DJ; Hofheinz RD; Hartel M; Kaehler GF; Neff W; Diehl SJ Onkologie; 2008 May; 31(5):230-5. PubMed ID: 18497511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of preoperative endorectal MRI stage classification on neurovascular bundle sparing aggressiveness and the radical prostatectomy positive margin rate. Brown JA; Rodin DM; Harisinghani M; Dahl DM Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 18640062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]