These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. The controversy of significance testing: misconceptions and alternatives. Glaser DN Am J Crit Care; 1999 Sep; 8(5):291-6. PubMed ID: 10467465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Confounding and effect modification: their significance in medical research. Olayinka BA Cent Afr J Med; 1997 Jan; 43(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 9185379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Challenging the validity of conclusions based on P-values alone: a critique of contemporary clinical research design and methods. Ebramzadeh E; McKellop H; Dorey F; Sarmiento A Instr Course Lect; 1994; 43():587-600. PubMed ID: 9097190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reporting research results: recommendations for improving communication. Cooper RJ; Wears RL; Schriger DL Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):561-4. PubMed ID: 12658257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of time-to-pregnancy as a measure in environmental epidemiology]. Idrovo AJ; SanĂn LH; Cole DC Biomedica; 2005 Sep; 25(3):398-411. PubMed ID: 16276687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis. Ioannidis JP J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical and clinical significance: alternative methods for understanding the importance of research findings. Glaros AG J Ir Dent Assoc; 2004; 50(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 15481525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How to make sense of clinical research. Wooten JM; Ross VM RN; 2005 Jan; 68(1):22-7; quiz 28. PubMed ID: 15742745 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Nursing intervention studies: a descriptive analysis of issues important to clinicians. Brown SJ Res Nurs Health; 2002 Aug; 25(4):317-27. PubMed ID: 12124725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Making sense of context-level influences on health. Hawe P Health Educ Res; 1998 Dec; 13(4):i-iv. PubMed ID: 10345901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Good study design and analysis plans as features of ethical research with humans. Weinberg JM; Kleinman KP IRB; 2003; 25(5):11-4. PubMed ID: 14870739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Pertinence of qualitative research: comparative approach in qualitative and quantitative research]. Corbalan JA Rech Soins Infirm; 2000 Jun; (61):13-22. PubMed ID: 12037858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The difficult and ubiquitous problems of multiplicities. Berry DA Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 17879328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding the error of our ways: mapping the concepts of validity and reliability. Higgins PA; Straub AJ Nurs Outlook; 2006; 54(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 16487776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Twenty statistical errors even you can find in biomedical research articles. Lang T Croat Med J; 2004 Aug; 45(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 15311405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Methodological issues associated with group intervention research. Murphy SA; Johnson LC Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 2006 Dec; 20(6):276-81. PubMed ID: 17145455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]