127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11512615)
1. Comparison of dosimetric standards of Canada and France for photons at 60Co and higher energies.
Shortt K; Ross C; Seuntjens J; Delaunay F; Ostrowsky A; Gross P; Leroy E
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Aug; 46(8):2119-42. PubMed ID: 11512615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Absorbed-dose beam quality conversion factors for cylindrical chambers in high energy photon beams.
Seuntjens JP; Ross CK; Shortt KR; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2763-79. PubMed ID: 11190960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Absorbed dose beam quality correction factors kappaQ for the NE2571 chamber in a 5 MV and a 10 MV photon beam.
Palmans H; Mondelaers W; Thierens H
Phys Med Biol; 1999 Mar; 44(3):647-63. PubMed ID: 10211800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of Australian and Canadian calibration coefficients for air kerma and absorbed dose to water for 60Co gamma radiation.
Shortt KR; Huntley RB; Kotler LH; Boas JF; Webb DV
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2006 Jun; 29(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16845927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The UK primary standard calorimeter for photon-beam absorbed dose measurement.
DuSautoy AR
Phys Med Biol; 1996 Jan; 41(1):137-51. PubMed ID: 8685252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Commissioning of an NRC-type sealed water calorimeter at METAS using 60Co gamma-rays.
Medin J; Ross CK; Stucki G; Klassen NV; Seuntjens JP
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(17):4073-86. PubMed ID: 15470924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shift in absorbed dose for megavoltage photons when changing to TRS-398 in Australia.
Butler DJ; Palmans H; Webb DV; ;
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Sep; 28(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 16250469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison between calculated and experimental kQ photon beam quality correction factors.
Andreo P
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Sep; 45(9):L25-38. PubMed ID: 11008946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of factors to convert absorbed dose calibrations from graphite to water for the NPL high-energy photon calibration service.
Nutbrown RF; Duane S; Shipley DR; Thomas RA
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):441-54. PubMed ID: 11858210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of graphite-to-water absorbed-dose transfers for 60Co photon beams using ionometry and Fricke dosimetry.
Chauvenet B; Baltès D; Delaunay F
Phys Med Biol; 1997 Nov; 42(11):2053-63. PubMed ID: 9394397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electron beam water calorimetry measurements to obtain beam quality conversion factors.
Muir BR; Cojocaru CD; McEwen MR; Ross CK
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5433-5444. PubMed ID: 28688120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental determination of beam quality conversion factors k(Q) in clinical photon beams using ferrous sulphate (Fricke) dosimetry.
Palm A; Mattsson O
Med Phys; 2002 Dec; 29(12):2756-62. PubMed ID: 12512708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The response of lif thermoluminescence dosemeters to photon beams in the energy range from 30 kV x rays to 60Co gamma rays.
Davis SD; Ross CK; Mobit PN; Van der Zwan L; Chase WJ; Shortt KR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 14653324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An absolute dose determination of helical tomotherapy accelerator, TomoTherapy High-Art II.
Bailat CJ; Buchillier T; Pachoud M; Moeckli R; Bochud FO
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3891-6. PubMed ID: 19810461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microionization chamber air-kerma calibration coefficients as a function of photon energy for x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co.
Snow JR; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041711. PubMed ID: 23556881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Absorbed dose to water determination with ionization chamber dosimetry and calorimetry in restricted neutron, photon, proton and heavy-ion radiation fields.
Brede HJ; Greif KD; Hecker O; Heeg P; Heese J; Jones DT; Kluge H; Schardt D
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(15):3667-82. PubMed ID: 16861773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A standard for absorbed dose rate to water in a 60Co field using a graphite calorimeter at the National Metrology Institute of Japan.
Morishita Y; Kato M; Takata N; Kurosawa T; Tanaka T; Saito N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013; 154(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 22951998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
