164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11513031)
1. Comparison of 3-D reconstruction with 3D-OSEM and with FORE+OSEM for PET.
Liu X; Comtat C; Michel C; Kinahan P; Defrise M; Townsend D
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Aug; 20(8):804-14. PubMed ID: 11513031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fast 3D iterative image reconstruction for SPECT with rotating slat collimators.
Holen RV; Vandenberghe S; Staelens S; De Beenhouwer J; Lemahieu I
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(3):715-29. PubMed ID: 19131666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. NEMA NU4-2008 image quality performance report for the microPET focus 120 and for various transmission and reconstruction methods.
Bahri MA; Plenevaux A; Warnock G; Luxen A; Seret A
J Nucl Med; 2009 Oct; 50(10):1730-8. PubMed ID: 19759103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accelerated 3D-OSEM image reconstruction using a Beowulf PC cluster for pinhole SPECT.
Zeniya T; Watabe H; Sohlberg A; Iida H
Ann Nucl Med; 2007 Nov; 21(9):537-43. PubMed ID: 18030588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating image reconstruction methods for tumor detection in 3-dimensional whole-body PET oncology imaging.
Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Swensson R; Comtat C; Lin M; Villemagne V; Trébossen R
J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):276-90. PubMed ID: 12571221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fourier rebinning of time-of-flight PET data.
Defrise M; Casey ME; Michel C; Conti M
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(12):2749-63. PubMed ID: 15930600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between rebinning methods and geometric re-projection for the estimation of missing oblique data in 3D-PET.
Ben Bouallègue F; Crouzet JF; Mariano-Goulart D
Ann Nucl Med; 2009 Nov; 23(9):821-7. PubMed ID: 19838768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 2.5-D simultaneous multislice reconstruction by series expansion methods from Fourier-rebinned PET data.
Obi T; Matej S; Lewitt RM; Herman GT
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 May; 19(5):474-84. PubMed ID: 11021690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficient methodologies for system matrix modelling in iterative image reconstruction for rotating high-resolution PET.
Ortuño JE; Kontaxakis G; Rubio JL; Guerra P; Santos A
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Apr; 55(7):1833-61. PubMed ID: 20224156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fully 4D list-mode reconstruction applied to respiratory-gated PET scans.
Grotus N; Reader AJ; Stute S; Rosenwald JC; Giraud P; Buvat I
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1705-21. PubMed ID: 19242055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fast reconstruction of 3D time-of-flight PET data by axial rebinning and transverse mashing.
Vandenberghe S; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Lewitt RM; Karp JS
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1603-21. PubMed ID: 16510966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multi-ray-based system matrix generation for 3D PET reconstruction.
Moehrs S; Defrise M; Belcari N; Guerra AD; Bartoli A; Fabbri S; Zanetti G
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6925-45. PubMed ID: 19001696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The usefulness of fully three-dimensional OSEM algorithm on lymph node metastases from lung cancer with 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Inoue K; Moriya E; Suzuki T; Ohnuki Y; Sato T; Kitamura H; Sasaki T; Fukushi M; Moriyama N; Fujii H
Ann Nucl Med; 2011 May; 25(4):277-87. PubMed ID: 21234724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of reconstruction techniques in regional cerebral blood flow SPECT using trade-off plots: a Monte Carlo study.
Olsson A; Arlig A; Carlsson GA; Gustafsson A
Nucl Med Commun; 2007 Sep; 28(9):719-25. PubMed ID: 17667751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The design and implementation of COSEM, an iterative algorithm for fully 3-D listmode data.
Levkovitz R; Falikman D; Zibulevsky M; Ben-Tal A; Nemirovski A
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Jul; 20(7):633-42. PubMed ID: 11465469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correction methods for random coincidences in fully 3D whole-body PET: impact on data and image quality.
Brasse D; Kinahan PE; Lartizien C; Comtat C; Casey M; Michel C
J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):859-67. PubMed ID: 15872361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MicroPET reconstruction with random coincidence correction via a joint Poisson model.
Chen TB; Chen JC; Lu HH; Liu RS
Med Eng Phys; 2008 Jul; 30(6):680-6. PubMed ID: 17644463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Objective and subjective comparison of standard 2-D and fully 3-D reconstructed data on a PET/CT system.
Strobel K; Rüdy M; Treyer V; Veit-Haibach P; Burger C; Hany TF
Nucl Med Commun; 2007 Jul; 28(7):555-9. PubMed ID: 17538397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproducibility of F18-FDG PET radiomic features for different cervical tumor segmentation methods, gray-level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms.
Altazi BA; Zhang GG; Fernandez DC; Montejo ME; Hunt D; Werner J; Biagioli MC; Moros EG
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):32-48. PubMed ID: 28891217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of 3-dimensional reconstruction algorithms for the high-resolution research tomograph.
van Velden FH; Kloet RW; van Berckel BN; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2009 Jan; 50(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 19091902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
