237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11513780)
1. Minimizing cervical esophageal anastomotic complications by a modified technique.
Gupta NM; Gupta R; Rao MS; Gupta V
Am J Surg; 2001 Jun; 181(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 11513780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture.
Wang WP; Gao Q; Wang KN; Shi H; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2013 May; 37(5):1043-50. PubMed ID: 23381675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
Nederlof N; Tilanus HW; Tran TC; Hop WC; Wijnhoven BP; de Jonge J
Ann Surg; 2011 Aug; 254(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 21725230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Complete mechanical cervical anastomosis using a narrow gastric tube after esophagectomy for cancer.
De Giacomo T; Francioni F; Venuta F; Trentino P; Moretti M; Rendina EA; Coloni GF
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Nov; 26(5):881-4. PubMed ID: 15519175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis.
Orringer MB; Marshall B; Iannettoni MD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Feb; 119(2):277-88. PubMed ID: 10649203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Double stapling method of anastomosis after esophagectomy with endoscopic stapler to prevent postoperative stricture.
Murayama I; Sato H; Suzuki T; Ootsuka Y; Song K; Yamagata M; Fukase T; Iwai S
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 1998 Oct; 8(5):295-301. PubMed ID: 9820722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Embedded Three-Layer Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Morbidity and Improves Short-Term Outcomes After Esophagectomy for Cancer.
Sun HB; Li Y; Liu XB; Zhang RX; Wang ZF; Zheng Y; Qin JJ; Li HM; Chen XK; Wu Z
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1131-8. PubMed ID: 26687140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Cervical anastomotic stenosis after gastric tube reconstruction in esophageal carcinoma. Evaluation of a patient sample 1989-1995].
Bruns CJ; Gawenda M; Wolfgarten B; Walter M
Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1997; 382(3):145-8. PubMed ID: 9324613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques.
Santos RS; Raftopoulos Y; Singh D; DeHoyos A; Fernando HC; Keenan RJ; Luketich JD; Landreneau RJ
Surgery; 2004 Oct; 136(4):917-25. PubMed ID: 15467679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Modified application of circular stapler to cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
Yan M; Chen YH; Liu XB; Shao LF; Li Y
Ai Zheng; 2009 Jul; 28(7):768-70. PubMed ID: 19624907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prevention of anastomotic stricture with a purse-string suture technique on the gastric side during esophageal carcinoma operations: retrospective study of 463 consecutive cases.
Zhang C; Yao MH; Jin T; Sun L; Hu J; Zha YX
World J Surg; 2008 Jun; 32(6):1008-12. PubMed ID: 18338209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Venous superdrained gastric tube pull-up procedure for hypopharyngeal and cervical esophageal reconstruction reduces postoperative anastomotic leakage and stricture.
Fujioka M; Hayashida K; Fukui K; Ishiyama S; Saijo H; Taniguchi K
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Aug; 30(8):1-6. PubMed ID: 28575244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer].
Francioni F; Anile M; Venuta F; De Giacomo T; Andreetti C; Diso D; Di Stasio M; D'Ecclesia G; Liparulo V; Coloni GF
Minerva Chir; 2006 Apr; 61(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 16871138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.
Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.
Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benign anastomotic strictures after transhiatal esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy: risk factors and management.
Honkoop P; Siersema PD; Tilanus HW; Stassen LP; Hop WC; van Blankenstein M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jun; 111(6):1141-6; discussion 1147-8. PubMed ID: 8642814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anastomotic leakage after intrathoracic versus cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis for oesophageal carcinoma in Chinese population: a retrospective cohort study.
Liu YJ; Fan J; He HH; Zhu SS; Chen QL; Cao RH
BMJ Open; 2018 Sep; 8(9):e021025. PubMed ID: 30181184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized trial comparing side-to-side stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in neck.
Saluja SS; Ray S; Pal S; Sanyal S; Agrawal N; Dash NR; Sahni P; Chattopadhyay TK
J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 Jul; 16(7):1287-95. PubMed ID: 22528571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture.
Fetzner UK; Hölscher AH
World J Surg; 2013 Sep; 37(9):2246-7. PubMed ID: 23736985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
