These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11513948)

  • 1. Stimulus artifact removal using a software-based two-stage peak detection algorithm.
    O'Keeffe DT; Lyons GM; Donnelly AE; Byrne CA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2001 Aug; 109(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 11513948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suppression of stimulus artifact contaminating electrically evoked electromyography.
    Liu J; Li S; Li X; Klein C; Rymer WZ; Zhou P
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2014; 34(2):381-9. PubMed ID: 24419021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulus artifact removal in EMG from muscles adjacent to stimulated muscles.
    Hines AE; Crago PE; Chapman GJ; Billian C
    J Neurosci Methods; 1996 Jan; 64(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 8869484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of Empirical Mode Decomposition Combined With Notch Filtering for Interpretation of Surface Electromyograms During Functional Electrical Stimulation.
    Pilkar R; Yarossi M; Ramanujam A; Rajagopalan V; Bayram MB; Mitchell M; Canton S; Forrest G
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Aug; 25(8):1268-1277. PubMed ID: 27834646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated removal of stimulus artifact in nerve conduction studies.
    Tracey BH; Krishnamachari S
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():6360-3. PubMed ID: 17945961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Real-Time Stimulus Artifact Rejection Via Template Subtraction.
    Limnuson K; Hui Lu ; Chiel HJ; Mohseni P
    IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst; 2014 Jun; 8(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 24107976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulation artifact in surface EMG signal: effect of the stimulation waveform, detection system, and current amplitude using hybrid stimulation technique.
    Mandrile F; Farina D; Pozzo M; Merletti R
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Dec; 11(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 14960117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recording and analysis of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) with MED-EL cochlear implants and different artifact reduction strategies in Matlab.
    Bahmer A; Peter O; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Aug; 191(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 20558202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors affecting the stimulus artifact tail in surface-recorded somatosensory-evoked potentials.
    Hua Y; Lovely DF; Doraiswami R
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2006 Mar; 44(3):226-41. PubMed ID: 16937164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A masked least-squares smoothing procedure for artifact reduction in scanning-EMG recordings.
    Corera Í; Eciolaza A; Rubio O; Malanda A; Rodríguez-Falces J; Navallas J
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2018 Aug; 56(8):1391-1402. PubMed ID: 29327334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Stimulus Artifact Removal Technique for SEMG Signal Processing During Functional Electrical Stimulation.
    Qiu S; Feng J; Xu R; Xu J; Wang K; He F; Qi H; Zhao X; Zhou P; Zhang L; Ming D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Aug; 62(8):1959-68. PubMed ID: 25730823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Method for Suppressing Electrical Stimulation Artifacts from Electromyography.
    Li Y; Chen J; Yang Y
    Int J Neural Syst; 2019 Aug; 29(6):1850054. PubMed ID: 30646793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Artifact characterization and removal for in vivo neural recording.
    Islam MK; Rastegarnia A; Nguyen AT; Yang Z
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Apr; 226():110-123. PubMed ID: 24512692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stimulation artifact correction method for estimation of early cortico-cortical evoked potentials.
    Trebaul L; Rudrauf D; Job AS; Mălîia MD; Popa I; Barborica A; Minotti L; Mîndruţă I; Kahane P; David O
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 May; 264():94-102. PubMed ID: 26952846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Empirical mode decomposition as a tool to remove the function electrical stimulation artifact from surface electromyograms: preliminary investigation.
    Pilkar RB; Yarossi M; Forrest G
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():1847-50. PubMed ID: 23366272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Artifact reduction in magnetic stimulation.
    Jakob C; Mathis J; Weyh T; Struppler A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 Aug; 89(4):287-9. PubMed ID: 7688693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Real time ECG artifact removal for myoelectric prosthesis control.
    Zhou P; Lock B; Kuiken TA
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Apr; 28(4):397-413. PubMed ID: 17395995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Removal of electrical stimulus artifact in local field potential recorded from subthalamic nucleus by using manifold denoising.
    Liu TC; Chen YC; Chen PL; Tu PH; Yeh CH; Yeap MC; Wu YH; Chen CC; Wu HT
    J Neurosci Methods; 2024 Mar; 403():110038. PubMed ID: 38145720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of evoked response latency and amplitude on stimulus artifact removal.
    Oyama AM; Itiki C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():6091-4. PubMed ID: 21097131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Generalized framework for stimulus artifact removal.
    Erez Y; Tischler H; Moran A; Bar-Gad I
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Aug; 191(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 20542059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.