These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11513948)

  • 41. Comparison of BCG artifact removal methods for evoked responses in simultaneous EEG-fMRI.
    Shams N; Alain C; Strother S
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Apr; 245():137-46. PubMed ID: 25721269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Stimulus artifact cancellation in the serosal recordings of gastric myoelectric activity using wavelet transform.
    Liang H; Lin Z
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Jul; 49(7):681-8. PubMed ID: 12083302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Canonical correlation analysis applied to remove muscle artifacts from the electroencephalogram.
    De Clercq W; Vergult A; Vanrumste B; Van Paesschen W; Van Huffel S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Dec; 53(12 Pt 1):2583-7. PubMed ID: 17153216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for cochlear ECAP recording: I. amplitude growth functions.
    Bahmer A; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Mar; 205(1):202-11. PubMed ID: 22209768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Application of velocity filters to somatosensory evoked potential measurements for removal of stimulus artifact.
    Yazdani N; Chan AD
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():6213-6. PubMed ID: 17945946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Automatic removal of various artifacts from EEG signals using combined methods.
    Gao J; Yang Y; Sun J; Yu G
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Oct; 27(5):312-20. PubMed ID: 20844440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Technology and instrumentation for detection and conditioning of the surface electromyographic signal: state of the art.
    Merletti R; Botter A; Troiano A; Merlo E; Minetto MA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):122-34. PubMed ID: 19042063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Reduction hybrid artifacts of EMG-EOG in electroencephalography evoked by prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Bai Y; Wan X; Zeng K; Ni Y; Qiu L; Li X
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Dec; 13(6):066016. PubMed ID: 27788128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Automatic Identification of Artifact-Related Independent Components for Artifact Removal in EEG Recordings.
    Zou Y; Nathan V; Jafari R
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2016 Jan; 20(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 25415992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Spectral cancellation of microstimulation artifact for simultaneous neural recording in situ.
    Gnadt JW; Echols SD; Yildirim A; Zhang H; Paul K
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Oct; 50(10):1129-35. PubMed ID: 14560765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Ultrahigh-frequency EEG during fMRI: pushing the limits of imaging-artifact correction.
    Freyer F; Becker R; Anami K; Curio G; Villringer A; Ritter P
    Neuroimage; 2009 Oct; 48(1):94-108. PubMed ID: 19539035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Closed-Loop Control of Myoelectric Prostheses With Electrotactile Feedback: Influence of Stimulation Artifact and Blanking.
    Hartmann C; Dosen S; Amsuess S; Farina D
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2015 Sep; 23(5):807-16. PubMed ID: 25222951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A digital averaging method for removal of stimulus artifacts in neurophysiologic experiments.
    Wichmann T
    J Neurosci Methods; 2000 May; 98(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 10837871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Methods for artifact detection and removal from scalp EEG: A review.
    Islam MK; Rastegarnia A; Yang Z
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2016 Nov; 46(4-5):287-305. PubMed ID: 27751622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Electrical stimulus artifact cancellation and neural spike detection on large multi-electrode arrays.
    Mena GE; Grosberg LE; Madugula S; Hottowy P; Litke A; Cunningham J; Chichilnisky EJ; Paninski L
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Nov; 13(11):e1005842. PubMed ID: 29131818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Toward true closed-loop neuromodulation: artifact-free recording during stimulation.
    Zhou A; Johnson BC; Muller R
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2018 Jun; 50():119-127. PubMed ID: 29471216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparisons of FIR and IIR implementations of a subtraction-based stimulus artifact rejection algorithm.
    Azin M; Chiel HJ; Mohseni P
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():1437-40. PubMed ID: 18002236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Towards a closed-loop system for stimulation and recording: an in vitro approach with embryonic cardiomyocytes.
    Nguyen T; Braeken D; Musa S; Krylychkina O; Bartic C; Gielen G; Eberle W
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():2735-8. PubMed ID: 21096211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Cochlear implant artifact attenuation in late auditory evoked potentials: a single channel approach.
    Mc Laughlin M; Lopez Valdes A; Reilly RB; Zeng FG
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():84-95. PubMed ID: 23727626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A modified algorithm of the combined ensemble empirical mode decomposition and independent component analysis for the removal of cardiac artifacts from neuromuscular electrical signals.
    Lee KJ; Choi EK; Lee SM; Oh S; Lee B
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Apr; 35(4):657-75. PubMed ID: 24622011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.