These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11514249)

  • 1. Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition?
    Bruin KJ; Wijers AA; van Staveren AS
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Sep; 112(9):1660-71. PubMed ID: 11514249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Event-related potentials to response production and inhibition in go/nogo task. I. Topographical characteristics to different visual stimulus sequences].
    Kaga Y; Iwadare Y; Noguchi S; Tando T; Aihara M
    No To Hattatsu; 2008 Jan; 40(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 18210859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex differences in equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: effects on N2 and P3.
    Melynyte S; Ruksenas O; Griskova-Bulanova I
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1565-1574. PubMed ID: 28258436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When 'go' and 'nogo' are equally frequent: ERP components and cortical tomography.
    Lavric A; Pizzagalli DA; Forstmeier S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 20(9):2483-8. PubMed ID: 15525290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of exposure to traumatic stressors on inhibitory control in police officers: a dense electrode array study using a Go/NoGo continuous performance task.
    Covey TJ; Shucard JL; Violanti JM; Lee J; Shucard DW
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):363-75. PubMed ID: 23528305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Event-related potentials for response inhibition in Parkinson's disease.
    Bokura H; Yamaguchi S; Kobayashi S
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):967-75. PubMed ID: 15716167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conflict and inhibition in the cued-Go/NoGo task.
    Randall WM; Smith JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Dec; 122(12):2400-7. PubMed ID: 21715225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study.
    Bruin KJ; Wijers AA
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Jul; 113(7):1172-82. PubMed ID: 12088714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study on the neural mechanism of inhibition of return by the event-related potential in the Go/NoGo task.
    Tian Y; Yao D
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 18524452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effects of Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment on Go/NoGo Semantic Categorization Task Performance and Event-Related Potentials.
    Mudar RA; Chiang HS; Eroh J; Nguyen LT; Maguire MJ; Spence JS; Kung F; Kraut MA; Hart J
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2016; 50(2):577-90. PubMed ID: 26836634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming.
    Kopp B; Mattler U; Goertz R; Rist F
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 99(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 8758967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motor and non-motor inhibition in the Go/NoGo task: an ERP and fMRI study.
    Smith JL; Jamadar S; Provost AL; Michie PT
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):244-53. PubMed ID: 22885679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ERP correlates of response inhibition to elemental and configural stimuli in a negative patterning task.
    Fox AM; Michie PT; Wynne CD; Maybery MT
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Jun; 111(6):1045-53. PubMed ID: 10825712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task.
    Bokura H; Yamaguchi S; Kobayashi S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Dec; 112(12):2224-32. PubMed ID: 11738192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Event-related potentials to response production and inhibition in go/nogo task. II. Developmental change of response inhibition].
    Kaga Y; Iwadare Y; Noguchi S; Tando T; Aihara M
    No To Hattatsu; 2008 Jan; 40(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 18210860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical Implication of Altered Inhibitory Response in Patients with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: Electrophysiological Evidence from a Go/Nogo Task.
    Min D; Kwon A; Kim Y; Jin MJ; Kim YW; Jeon H; Kim S; Jeon HJ; Lee SH
    Brain Topogr; 2020 Mar; 33(2):208-220. PubMed ID: 32034577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The presented probability modulates emotional evaluation of neutral stimuli: insights from ERPs in Go/Nogo task.
    Cao J; Cai Y; Zhao X; Zhou Y; Sun G; Zhao L
    J Integr Neurosci; 2013 Dec; 12(4):449-60. PubMed ID: 24372065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.