These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11514261)

  • 1. The influence of electrode location errors on EEG dipole source localization with a realistic head model.
    Wang Y; Gotman J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Sep; 112(9):1777-80. PubMed ID: 11514261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization.
    Whittingstall K; Stroink G; Gates L; Connolly JF; Finley A
    Biomed Eng Online; 2003 Jun; 2():14. PubMed ID: 12807534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of performance of spherical and realistic head models in dipole localization from noisy EEG.
    Vanrumste B; Van Hoey G; Van de Walle R; D'Havé MR; Lemahieu IA; Boon PA
    Med Eng Phys; 2002 Jul; 24(6):403-18. PubMed ID: 12135649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography in a realistic geometry head model: a simulation study.
    Ding L; Lai Y; He B
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jan; 50(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 15715421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial mislocalization of EEG electrodes -- effects on accuracy of dipole estimation.
    Khosla D; Don M; Kwong B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Feb; 110(2):261-71. PubMed ID: 10210615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EEG dipole source localization using artificial neural networks.
    Van Hoey G; De Clercq J; Vanrumste B; Van De Walle R; Lemahieu I; D'Havé M; Boon P
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Apr; 45(4):997-1011. PubMed ID: 10795987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating a neutral reference for electroencephalographic recordings: the importance of using a high-density montage and a realistic head model.
    Liu Q; Balsters JH; Baechinger M; van der Groen O; Wenderoth N; Mantini D
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Oct; 12(5):056012. PubMed ID: 26305167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of cavities on EEG dipole localization and their relations with surface electrode positions.
    He B; Musha T
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1989 Dec; 24(4):269-82. PubMed ID: 2606568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dipole estimation errors due to not incorporating anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Staelens S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6079-93. PubMed ID: 19779215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of EEG electrode density on dipole localization accuracy using two realistically shaped skull resistivity models.
    Laarne PH; Tenhunen-Eskelinen ML; Hyttinen JK; Eskola HJ
    Brain Topogr; 2000; 12(4):249-54. PubMed ID: 10912732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Algorithm to find high density EEG scalp coordinates and analysis of their correspondence to structural and functional regions of the brain.
    Giacometti P; Perdue KL; Diamond SG
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 May; 229():84-96. PubMed ID: 24769168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of head conductivity frequency response in vivo with optimized EIT-EEG.
    Dabek J; Kalogianni K; Rotgans E; van der Helm FCT; Kwakkel G; van Wegen EEH; Daffertshofer A; de Munck JC
    Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 127():484-495. PubMed ID: 26589336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of measurement noise and electrode mislocalisation on EEG dipole-source localisation.
    Van Hoey G; Vanrumste B; D'Havé M; Van de Walle R; Lemahieu I; Boon P
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2000 May; 38(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 10912345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forward and inverse problems of EEG dipole localization.
    Musha T; Okamoto Y
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1999; 27(3-5):189-239. PubMed ID: 10864280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental tests of EEG source localization accuracy in spherical head models.
    Cuffin BN; Schomer DL; Ives JR; Blume H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Jan; 112(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 11137660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
    Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subspace electrode selection methodology for the reduction of the effect of uncertain conductivity values in the EEG dipole localization: a simulation study using a patient-specific head model.
    Crevecoeur G; Restrepo VM; Staelens S
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(7):1963-86. PubMed ID: 22421525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the estimation of the number of dipole sources in EEG source localization.
    Bai X; He B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep; 116(9):2037-43. PubMed ID: 16043395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling of post-surgical brain and skull defects in the EEG inverse problem with the boundary element method.
    Bénar CG; Gotman J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 113(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 11801424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.