These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1151596)

  • 1. Sex differences in the eyes of expert personality assessors: unwarranted conclusions.
    Werner PD; Block J
    J Pers Assess; 1975 Apr; 39(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 1151596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sex differences in the eyes of expert personality assessors: blind spots?
    Haan N; Livson N
    J Pers Assess; 1973 Oct; 37(5):486-92. PubMed ID: 4780228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The borderline personality diagnosis in adolescents: gender differences and subtypes.
    Bradley R; Zittel Conklin C; Westen D
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2005 Sep; 46(9):1006-19. PubMed ID: 16109003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Q-sort assessment vs visual analog scale in the evaluation of smile esthetics.
    Schabel BJ; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4 Suppl):S61-71. PubMed ID: 19362268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A quantitative evaluation of sex differences in implicit personality theories.
    Eckes T
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1989; 141(2):99-112. PubMed ID: 2624534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is it easier to use a secure mother as a secure base? Attachment Q-sort correlates of the adult attachment interview.
    Posada G; Waters E; Crowell JA; Lay KL
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1995; 60(2-3):133-45. PubMed ID: 8559154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and standardization of measures of stereotypic sex-role concepts and of sex-role adoption in adults.
    Newman RC
    Psychol Rep; 1976 Oct; 39(2):623-30. PubMed ID: 981483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex differences in dependency: a comparison of objective and projective measures.
    Bornstein RF; Manning KA; Krukonis AB; Rossner SC; Mastrosimone CC
    J Pers Assess; 1993 Aug; 61(1):169-81. PubMed ID: 8377101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judging personality assessments: putting the Barnum report in perspective.
    Schroeder HE; Lesyk CK
    J Pers Assess; 1976 Oct; 40(5):470-4. PubMed ID: 993959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Engaging hard to engage clients: a Q methodological study involving clinical psychologists.
    Lister M; Gardner D
    Psychol Psychother; 2006 Sep; 79(Pt 3):419-43. PubMed ID: 16945200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceived proposer personality characteristics and gender differences in acceptance of casual sex offers.
    Conley TD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Feb; 100(2):309-29. PubMed ID: 21171789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A survey of psychological assessment feedback practices.
    Smith SR; Wiggins CM; Gorske TT
    Assessment; 2007 Sep; 14(3):310-9. PubMed ID: 17690386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using a general model of personality to understand sex differences in the personality disorders.
    Lynam DR; Widiger TA
    J Pers Disord; 2007 Dec; 21(6):583-602. PubMed ID: 18072861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Failure effects and gender differences in perfectionism].
    Masson AM; Cadot M; Ansseau M
    Encephale; 2003; 29(2):125-35. PubMed ID: 14567164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Q-technique methodology in the study of healthy aged men: Part I.
    Kleban MH
    Exp Aging Res; 1979 Apr; 5(2):109-35. PubMed ID: 520375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Psychopathy Q-sort: construct validity evidence in a nonclinical sample.
    Fowler KA; Lilienfeld SO
    Assessment; 2007 Mar; 14(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 17314182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Convergent validity of the SWAP-200 dependency scales.
    Smith SW; Hilsenroth MJ; Bornstein RF
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2009 Aug; 197(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 19684499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utilizing Q-sort for needs assessment of adolescent prenatal clients.
    Zanecchia MD
    ANA Publ; 1984 Mar; (MCH-14):42-4. PubMed ID: 6561943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex of experimenter and social norm effects on reports of sexual behavior in young men and women.
    Fisher TD
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Feb; 36(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 17187217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex differences in interpersonal problems: a circumplex analysis.
    Gurtman MB; Lee DL
    Psychol Assess; 2009 Dec; 21(4):515-27. PubMed ID: 19947786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.