457 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11515994)
1. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a methodologic study comparing linear radiographic with histometric measurements.
Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Nummikoski PV; Buser D; Schenk RK; Cochran DL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):475-85. PubMed ID: 11515994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible.
Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Schenk RK; Buser D; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1372-83. PubMed ID: 11699479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible.
Hermann JS; Buser D; Schenk RK; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2000 Sep; 71(9):1412-24. PubMed ID: 11022770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of a machined collar on crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a histometric study in the canine mandible.
Hermann JS; Jones AA; Bakaeen LG; Buser D; Schoolfield JD; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2011 Sep; 82(9):1329-38. PubMed ID: 21486176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible.
Hermann JS; Cochran DL; Nummikoski PV; Buser D
J Periodontol; 1997 Nov; 68(11):1117-30. PubMed ID: 9407406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible.
King GN; Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Buser D; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1111-7. PubMed ID: 12416767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biologic width around different implant-abutment interface configurations. A radiographic evaluation of the effect of horizontal offset and concave abutment profile in the canine mandible.
Caram SJ; Huynh-Ba G; Schoolfield JD; Jones AA; Cochran DL; Belser UC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1114-22. PubMed ID: 25216137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A radiographic evaluation of bone healing around submerged and non-submerged dental implants in beagle dogs.
Fiorellini JP; Buser D; Paquette DW; Williams RC; Haghighi D; Weber HP
J Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 70(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 10225540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone response to functionally loaded, two-piece zirconia implants: A preclinical histometric study.
Janner SFM; Gahlert M; Bosshardt DD; Roehling S; Milz S; Higginbottom F; Buser D; Cochran DL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Mar; 29(3):277-289. PubMed ID: 29288505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. One-step surgical placement of Brånemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study.
Becker W; Becker BE; Israelson H; Lucchini JP; Handelsman M; Ammons W; Rosenberg E; Rose L; Tucker LM; Lekholm U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 9274074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical and radiographic changes around dental implants inserted in different levels in relation to the crestal bone, under different restoration protocols, in the dog model.
Pontes AE; Ribeiro FS; da Silva VC; Margonar R; Piattelli A; Cirelli JA; Marcantonio E
J Periodontol; 2008 Mar; 79(3):486-94. PubMed ID: 18315431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histomorphometrical and clinical comparison of submerged and nonsubmerged implants subjected to experimental peri-implantitis in dogs.
Zechner W; Kneissel M; Kim S; Ulm C; Watzek G; Plenk H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Feb; 15(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 14731174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. I. Radiographic analysis.
Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Nummikoski PV; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
J Periodontol; 1997 Mar; 68(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 9100194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biologic Width around one- and two-piece titanium implants.
Hermann JS; Buser D; Schenk RK; Schoolfield JD; Cochran DL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Dec; 12(6):559-71. PubMed ID: 11737099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effects of Subcrestal Implant Placement on Crestal Bone Levels and Bone-to-Abutment Contact: A Microcomputed Tomographic and Histologic Study in Dogs.
Fetner M; Fetner A; Koutouzis T; Clozza E; Tovar N; Sarendranath A; Coelho PG; Neiva K; Janal MN; Neiva R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1068-75. PubMed ID: 26394343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in crestal bone around endosseous implants during functional loading: a radiographic evaluation in edentulous patients comparing different implant designs.
Tymstra N; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Dec; 32(6):677-86. PubMed ID: 23057057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. Part I: A retrospective radiographic evaluation in humans comparing two non-submerged implant designs with different machined collar lengths.
Hänggi MP; Hänggi DC; Schoolfield JD; Meyer J; Cochran DL; Hermann JS
J Periodontol; 2005 May; 76(5):791-802. PubMed ID: 15898941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of non-matching implant and abutment diameters on radiographic crestal bone levels in dogs.
Jung RE; Jones AA; Higginbottom FL; Wilson TG; Schoolfield J; Buser D; Hämmerle CH; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2008 Feb; 79(2):260-70. PubMed ID: 18251640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of implant design on marginal bone changes around early loaded, chemically modified, sandblasted Acid-etched-surfaced implants: a histologic analysis in dogs.
Valderrama P; Bornstein MM; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Higginbottom FL; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):1025-34. PubMed ID: 21142981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of microgap location and configuration on radiographic bone loss around submerged implants: an experimental study in dogs.
Weng D; Nagata MJ; Bosco AF; de Melo LG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):941-6. PubMed ID: 22010074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
