These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11515995)

  • 1. The use and abuse of the Periotest for 2-piece implant/abutment systems.
    Faulkner MG; Giannitsios D; Lipsett AW; Wolfaardt JF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 11515995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between contact time measurements and PTV values when using the Periotest to measure implant stability.
    Meredith N; Friberg B; Sennerby L; Aparicio C
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 9728122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An improved impact technique for monitoring percutaneous implant integrity.
    Swain R; Faulkner G; Raboud D; Wolfaardt J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 18548922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring abutment/implant joint integrity with the Periotest instrument.
    Faulkner MG; Wolfaardt JF; Chan A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(5):681-8. PubMed ID: 10531740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of the Periotest value as the initial success criteria of an implant: 8-year report.
    Aparicio C
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1997 Apr; 17(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 9497709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical state assessment of the implant-bone continuum: a better understanding of the Periotest method.
    Tricio J; Laohapand P; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M; Naert I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 7615316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the implant master cast by means of the Periotest method.
    May KB; Curtis A; Wang RF
    Implant Dent; 1999; 8(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 10635155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Periotest: an objective clinical diagnosis of bone apposition toward implants.
    Teerlinck J; Quirynen M; Darius P; van Steenberghe D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 1843494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
    Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of the implant abutment on the Periotest value: an in vivo study.
    Gomez-Roman G; Lukas D
    Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(10):797-9. PubMed ID: 11820048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The precision of fit at the implant prosthodontic interface.
    May KB; Edge MJ; Russell MM; Razzoog ME; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 May; 77(5):497-502. PubMed ID: 9151270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of the Periotest system. Part I: Examiner reliability and repeatability of readings. Dental Implant Clinical Group (Planning Committee).
    Manz MC; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Implant Dent; 1992; 1(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 1288806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part 2: peri-implant bone loss follow-up. An in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell instruments.
    Lachmann S; Laval JY; Jäger B; Axmann D; Gomez-Roman G; Groten M; Weber H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 16441788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A no-contact vibration device for measuring implant stability.
    Hayashi M; Kobayashi C; Ogata H; Yamaoka M; Ogiso B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):931-6. PubMed ID: 20491836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bicortically stabilized implant load transfer.
    Jeong CM; Caputo AA; Wylie RS; Son SC; Jeon YC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 12608670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant-abutment junction in an internally notched morse-taper oral implant: influence of abutment design.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Sahin S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 15248881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnosis of ankylosis in permanent incisors by expert ratings, Periotest and digital sound wave analysis.
    Campbell KM; Casas MJ; Kenny DJ; Chau T
    Dent Traumatol; 2005 Aug; 21(4):206-12. PubMed ID: 16026526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of two noninvasive techniques to evaluate implant stability: Periotest and Osstell Mentor.
    Oh JS; Kim SG; Lim SC; Ong JL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 19095473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Damping characteristics of bone-to-implant interfaces. A clinical study with the Periotest device.
    van Steenberghe D; Tricio J; Naert I; Nys M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1995 Mar; 6(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 7669865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis of interface force transmission of internal-cone implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Aug; 28(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 18717378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.