These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11516886)

  • 1. A comparison between on-site immunoassay drug-testing devices and laboratory results.
    Grönholm M; Lillsunde P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2001 Sep; 121(1-2):37-46. PubMed ID: 11516886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance evaluation of on-site oral fluid drug screening devices in normal police procedure in Germany.
    Musshoff F; Hokamp EG; Bott U; Madea B
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 May; 238():120-4. PubMed ID: 24699311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Roadside oral fluid testing: comparison of the results of drugwipe 5 and drugwipe benzodiazepines on-site tests with laboratory confirmation results of oral fluid and whole blood.
    Pehrsson A; Gunnar T; Engblom C; Seppä H; Jama A; Lillsunde P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Mar; 175(2-3):140-8. PubMed ID: 17640837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laboratory evaluation and field application of roadside oral fluid collectors and drug testing devices.
    Crouch DJ; Walsh JM; Cangianelli L; Quintela O
    Ther Drug Monit; 2008 Apr; 30(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 18367979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multiple-site laboratory evaluation of three on-site urinalysis drug-testing devices.
    Crouch DJ; Frank JF; Farrell LJ; Karsch HM; Klaunig JE
    J Anal Toxicol; 1998 Oct; 22(6):493-502. PubMed ID: 9788525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Confirmation by LC-MS of drugs in oral fluid obtained from roadside testing.
    Concheiro M; de Castro A; Quintela O; Cruz A; López-Rivadulla M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Aug; 170(2-3):156-62. PubMed ID: 17658709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the accuracy of on-site multi-analyte drug testing devices in the determination of the prevalence of illicit drugs in drivers.
    Buchan BJ; Walsh JM; Leaverton PE
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Mar; 43(2):395-9. PubMed ID: 9544550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of drugs of abuse in simultaneously collected oral fluid, urine and blood from Norwegian drug drivers.
    Vindenes V; Lund HM; Andresen W; Gjerde H; Ikdahl SE; Christophersen AS; Øiestad EL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):165-71. PubMed ID: 22284072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On-site testing of saliva and sweat with Drugwipe and determination of concentrations of drugs of abuse in saliva, plasma and urine of suspected users.
    Samyn N; van Haeren C
    Int J Legal Med; 2000; 113(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 10876986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An analytical evaluation of eight on-site oral fluid drug screening devices using laboratory confirmation results from oral fluid.
    Blencowe T; Pehrsson A; Lillsunde P; Vimpari K; Houwing S; Smink B; Mathijssen R; Van der Linden T; Legrand SA; Pil K; Verstraete A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):173-9. PubMed ID: 21183299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Roadside drug testing: comparison of two legal approaches in Belgium.
    Van der Linden T; Wille SM; Ramírez-Fernandez M; Verstraete AG; Samyn N
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Apr; 249():148-55. PubMed ID: 25700110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of on-site oral fluid drug screening devices DrugWipe 5+ and Rapid STAT using oral fluid for confirmation analysis.
    Pehrsson A; Blencowe T; Vimpari K; Langel K; Engblom C; Lillsunde P
    J Anal Toxicol; 2011 May; 35(4):211-8. PubMed ID: 21513614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Driving under the influence of drugs -- evaluation of analytical data of drugs in oral fluid, serum and urine, and correlation with impairment symptoms.
    Toennes SW; Kauert GF; Steinmeyer S; Moeller MR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Sep; 152(2-3):149-55. PubMed ID: 15978340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of eight commercial on-site screening devices for drugs-of-abuse testing.
    Leino A; Saarimies J; Grönholm M; Lillsunde P
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2001 Jul; 61(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 11465347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prevalence of psychoactive substances in truck drivers in the Nord-Pas-de-Calais region (France).
    Labat L; Fontaine B; Delzenne C; Doublet A; Marek MC; Tellier D; Tonneau M; Lhermitte M; Frimat P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jan; 174(2-3):90-4. PubMed ID: 17418990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative evaluation of the instant-view 5-panel test card with OnTrak TesTcup Pro 5: comparison with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
    Moody DE; Fang WB; Andrenyak DM; Monti KM; Jones C
    J Anal Toxicol; 2006; 30(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 16620532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prevalence and disposition of drugs of abuse and opioid treatment drugs in oral fluid.
    Cone EJ; Clarke J; Tsanaclis L
    J Anal Toxicol; 2007 Oct; 31(8):424-33. PubMed ID: 17988455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of the MTP immunoassay with EMIT in blood screening for drugs].
    Käferstein H; Sticht G
    Arch Kriminol; 1998; 202(5-6):165-72. PubMed ID: 10023491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance evaluation of four on-site drug-testing devices for detection of drugs of abuse in urine.
    Peace MR; Tarnai LD; Poklis A
    J Anal Toxicol; 2000 Oct; 24(7):589-94. PubMed ID: 11043664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Illicit Drugs in Oral Fluid: Evaluation of Two Collection Devices.
    Cohier C; Mégarbane B; Roussel O
    J Anal Toxicol; 2017 Jan; 41(1):71-76. PubMed ID: 27681339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.