268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11517043)
1. Reassessment of breast cancers missed during routine screening mammography: a community-based study.
Yankaskas BC; Schell MJ; Bird RE; Desrochers DA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 11517043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Breast carcinoma diagnosed in mammographic screening incidentally. Research on the radiologic signs in prior mammograms].
Marra V; Frigerio A; Di Virgilio MR; Menna S; Burke P
Radiol Med; 1999 Nov; 98(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 10780212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiologist interpretive volume and breast cancer screening accuracy in a Canadian organized screening program.
Théberge I; Chang SL; Vandal N; Daigle JM; Guertin MH; Pelletier E; Brisson J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Mar; 106(3):djt461. PubMed ID: 24598715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interval breast cancers: absolute and proportional incidence and blinded review in a community mammographic screening program.
Carbonaro LA; Azzarone A; Paskeh BB; Brambilla G; Brunelli S; Calori A; Caumo F; Malerba P; Menicagli L; Sconfienza LM; Vadalà G; Brambilla G; Fantini L; Ciatto S; Sardanelli F
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):e84-91. PubMed ID: 24369953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. First epidemiological analysis of breast cancer incidence and tumor characteristics after implementation of population-based digital mammography screening.
Weigel S; Batzler WU; Decker T; Hense HW; Heindel W
Rofo; 2009 Dec; 181(12):1144-50. PubMed ID: 19859859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Macaskill P
Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jun; 14(7):583-9. PubMed ID: 23623721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A review of interval breast cancers diagnosed among participants of the Nova Scotia Breast Screening Program.
Payne JI; Caines JS; Gallant J; Foley TJ
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 23169791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer reviewing of screening mammography in Taiwan: its reliability and the improvement.
Pan HB; Hsu GC; Yang TL; Huang JS; Chou CP; Liang HL; Lee SK; Chou YH; Li HJ; Wong KF
Chin Med J (Engl); 2013 Jan; 126(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 23286480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography.
Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Brenner RJ
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 14764891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs.
Elmore JG; Nakano CY; Koepsell TD; Desnick LM; D'Orsi CJ; Ransohoff DF
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Sep; 95(18):1384-93. PubMed ID: 13130114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists' ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice.
Henderson LM; Benefield T; Marsh MW; Schroeder BF; Durham DD; Yankaskas BC; Bowling JM
Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):278-89. PubMed ID: 25435185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends in incidence and detection of advanced breast cancer at biennial screening mammography in The Netherlands: a population based study.
Nederend J; Duijm LE; Voogd AC; Groenewoud JH; Jansen FH; Louwman MW
Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Jan; 14(1):R10. PubMed ID: 22230363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening mammography after breast cancer treatment: patterns in community practice.
Krishnaraj A; Yankaskas BC; Stearns SC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 May; 97(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 16331348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can missed breast cancer be recognized by regular peer auditing on screening mammography?
Pan HB; Yang TL; Hsu GC; Chiang CL; Huang JS; Chou CP; Wang YC; Liang HL; Lee SK; Chou YH; Wong KF
J Chin Med Assoc; 2012 Sep; 75(9):464-7. PubMed ID: 22989543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Persistent Untreated Screening-Detected Breast Cancer: An Argument Against Delaying Screening or Increasing the Interval Between Screenings.
Arleo EK; Monticciolo DL; Monsees B; McGinty G; Sickles EA
J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Jul; 14(7):863-867. PubMed ID: 28457814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening mammography interpretation test: more frequent mistakes.
Gozzi G; Martinoli C; Conti GM; Ganzetti A; Bodini M; Fiorentino C; Marini UP; Santini D; Bacigalupo L
Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):268-79. PubMed ID: 15775896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of 172 subtle findings on prior normal mammograms in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening.
Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Brenner RJ; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2003 Feb; 226(2):494-503. PubMed ID: 12563145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Missed and true interval and screen-detected breast cancers in a population based screening program.
Hoff SR; Samset JH; Abrahamsen AL; Vigeland E; Klepp O; Hofvind S
Acad Radiol; 2011 Apr; 18(4):454-60. PubMed ID: 21216632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography.
Warren Burhenne LJ; Wood SA; D'Orsi CJ; Feig SA; Kopans DB; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Tabar L; Vyborny CJ; Castellino RA
Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):554-62. PubMed ID: 10796939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
