108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11518345)
1. A radiographic analysis of computer prediction in conjunction with orthognathic surgery.
Loh S; Heng JK; Ward-Booth P; Winchester L; McDonald F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Aug; 30(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 11518345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer prediction of hard tissue profiles in orthognathic surgery.
Loh S; Yow M
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 12593006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction accuracy of soft tissue profile in orthognathic surgery.
Mankad B; Cisneros GJ; Freeman K; Eisig SB
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 10337247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical prediction reliability: a comparison of two computer software systems.
Aharon PA; Eisig S; Cisneros GJ
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 9456619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The accuracy of video imaging prediction in soft tissue outcome after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.
Lu CH; Ko EW; Huang CS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 61(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 12618973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dolphin Imaging Software: an analysis of the accuracy of cephalometric digitization and orthognathic prediction.
Power G; Breckon J; Sherriff M; McDonald F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 34(6):619-26. PubMed ID: 15916879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.
Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of a computer-based orthognathic surgery prediction system to postsurgical results.
Gerbo LR; Poulton DR; Covell DA; Russell CA
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 9456618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of manual traced images and corresponding scanned radiographs digitally traced.
Naoumova J; Lindman R
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 19342425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of video imaging in mandibular surgery.
Carter AC; Larson BE; Guenthner TA
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(4):289-300. PubMed ID: 9456606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of bimaxillary surgical planning with the 3-D orthognathic surgery simulator.
Csaszar GR; Niederdellmann H
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2000; 15(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 11307223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of soft tissue profiles in orthodontic surgery with the Dentofacial Planner.
Csaszar GR; Brüker-Csaszar B; Niederdellmann H
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 10895643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Method to verify the accuracy of model surgery and prediction tracing.
Omura T; Glickman RS; Super S
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 9456630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A computerized measurement of dental relapse following orthognathic surgery.
al-Kassab B; Barker GR
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991; 6(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 1820408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of computer-generated prediction tracing.
Cangialosi TJ; Chung JM; Elliott DF; Meistrell ME
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 7486242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-assisted orthognathic treatment planning.
Conover MA; Wishan MS
J Calif Dent Assoc; 1994 May; 22(5):27-31. PubMed ID: 8598530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-dimensional cephalometry and computerized orthognathic surgical treatment planning.
Kusnoto B
Clin Plast Surg; 2007 Jul; 34(3):417-26. PubMed ID: 17692701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of computer-generated cephalometrics.
Nimkarn Y; Miles PG
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 9081992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the linearity of soft- to hard-tissue movement after orthognathic surgery.
Chew MT; Sandham A; Wong HB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):665-70. PubMed ID: 18984399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Introduction of a three-dimensional anthropometry of the viscerocranium. Part II: evaluating osseous and soft tissue changes following orthognathic surgery.
Landes CA; Zachar R; Diehl T; Kovács AF
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2002 Feb; 30(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 12064880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
