208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11518839)
1. Comparison of the oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BPM-100(Beta) ) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
Mattu GS; Perry TL; Wright JM
Blood Press Monit; 2001 Jun; 6(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 11518839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of a new algorithm for the BPM-100 electronic oscillometric office blood pressure monitor.
Wright JM; Mattu GS; Perry TL; Gelferc ME; Strange KD; Zorn A; Chen Y
Blood Press Monit; 2001 Jun; 6(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 11518840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the automated non-invasive oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BpTRU) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in a paediatric population.
Mattu GS; Heran BS; Wright JM
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 15021077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inflationary oscillometric blood pressure monitoring: validation of the OMRON-MIT.
Golara M; Jones C; Randhawa M; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2002 Dec; 7(6):325-8. PubMed ID: 12488653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
Rogers P; Burke V; Stroud P; Puddey IB
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1999; 26(5-6):477-81. PubMed ID: 10386242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Omron 705IT (HEM-759-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol.
Coleman A; Freeman P; Steel S; Shennan A
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Feb; 11(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 16410738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of an automated oscillometric blood pressure wrist device.
Cuckson AC; Moran P; Seed P; Reinders A; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 15021076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the Microlife BP 3BTO-A oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to a modified British Hypertension Society protocol.
Cuckson AC; Reinders A; Shabeeh H; Shennan AH;
Blood Press Monit; 2002 Dec; 7(6):319-24. PubMed ID: 12488652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric automated blood pressure monitors in the setting of preeclampsia.
Natarajan P; Shennan AH; Penny J; Halligan AW; de Swiet M; Anthony J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 181(5 Pt 1):1203-10. PubMed ID: 10561646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of sequential same arm agreement of blood pressure measurements by a CVProfilor DO-2020 versus a Baumanometer mercury sphygmomanometer.
Prisant LM; Resnick LM; Hollenberg SM
Blood Press Monit; 2001 Jun; 6(3):149-52. PubMed ID: 11518838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the Omron M7 (HEM-780-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol.
Coleman A; Steel S; Freeman P; de Greeff A; Shennan A
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 18199924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous validation of the SunTech 247 diagnostic station blood pressure measurement device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol, the International Protocol and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards.
Polo Friz H; Facchetti R; Primitz L; Beltrame L; Galbiati V; Ricioppo A; Bombelli M; Sega R
Blood Press Monit; 2009 Oct; 14(5):222-7. PubMed ID: 19741510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the Schiller BR-102 ambulatory blood pressure system according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N
Blood Press Monit; 1999 Feb; 4(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 10362889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Overall accuracy of the BpTRU--an automated electronic blood pressure device.
Mattu GS; Heran BS; Wright JM
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 15021078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wrist blood pressure-measuring devices: a comparative study of accuracy with a standard auscultatory method using a mercury manometer.
Altunkan S; Yildiz S; Azer S
Blood Press Monit; 2002 Oct; 7(5):281-4. PubMed ID: 12409888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement.
Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Babaeva LA; Moiseev VS
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 16534410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
